Russian public initiative voting. Russian Public Initiative - How to Vote

For more than a year, the site "Russian public initiative" What are the results? Is it possible to influence social initiatives to something?

Who initiated a public initiative?

In 2012, on behalf of the President of Russia ("May Decree" No. 601), the Government of the Russian Federation approved the concept of forming a mechanism for the public submission of citizens' proposals Russian Federation With the use of information and telecommunication network "Internet" for consideration in the Government of the Russian Federation, proposals received support for at least 100 thousand citizens of the Russian Federation for one year.

On the basis of the concept, a decree of the President of the Russian Federation was issued on March 4, 2013 No. 183 "On the consideration of public initiatives directed by citizens of the Russian Federation using the Russian Public Initiative Internet Resource, which came into force immediately after signing. However, the need to introduce the Institute of Public Initiative, Vladimir Putin, mentioned the same year in his message Federal Assembly. The public initiative stood in his speech in one row with the need for a broad public debate, "and with practical results, when public initiatives become part of public policy and society controls their execution." At the same time, the president instructed to develop. Such a law was adopted on July 21, 2014 (No. 212-ФЗ). The president also said that "all bills, key state decisions, strategic plans must be held civil, the so-called" zero ", reading with the participation of NGOs, other civil society institutions." With these functions, he laid on public advice under the authorities.

From this excursion to the history of public initiative it is obvious that the development of public initiative is a matter of state importance that the president himself gave.

Who oversees public initiative?

By decree of the President of the Russian Federation, the site "Russian Public Initiative" was created. A certain non-profit organization "Information Democracy Foundation" was responsible for the placement of proposals and voting for them, which was established back in 2012. The founder and president of the Foundation is Ilya Massoh, a former employee of IBMi former Deputy Minister of Communications and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation. Among the permitted activities of the Foundation, the following are the following: a study of market opportunities and identifying public opinion, activities in the field of law, publishing, advertising activities, other financial intermediation and advice on commercial activities and management.

Thus, formally controlling the public initiative did not get the Ministry of Communications, but went into private hands.

What questions can be put in a public initiative?

According to the decree of the President of the Russian Federation, a public initiative can be made by the adult citizens of Russia on the socio-economic development of the country, the improvement of state and municipal management through the Russian Public Initiative Internet resource ("Swari"). Here we see only two directions: the socio-economic development of the country and improvement government controlled. In such directions, if you wish, you can enter almost any question. If, for example, it is necessary to make a question of security on the Internet voting, then this will be "public administration in the field of security". If you need to make an initiative on human rights, then this "public administration in the field of human rights". This suggests that the clarification of the areas for which a public initiative can be made is actually nothing specifies. Therefore, it is more appropriate to limit the areas of initiative by designating prohibitions.

The presidential decree contains several groups of such prohibitions. The first group is the requirements for the text of the initiative. The text should not contain obscene or offensive expressions, threats to the life or health of citizens, calls for extremist activities.

The second group of prohibitions is the requirements of legality. The initiative must comply with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, generally accepted principles and norms international law, including in the field of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens. What does this mean? For example, that the draft of the new Constitution of Russia cannot be taken to the vote. It is impossible to offer something fundamentally new in the field of public administration, if it goes the contrast with the basics of constitutional system.

The third group of prohibitions is the requirement of compliance with the referendum law. In other words, the voting on the public initiative cannot be made by the questions that cannot be submitted to the referendum. What are these questions?

Article 6 The law on a referendum calls the following issues that cannot be submitted to a referendum:

1) on the change in the status of a subject (subjects) of the Russian Federation, enshrined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation;

2) on the early termination or extension of the term of office of the President of the Russian Federation, the State Duma, about conducting their early elections or on the transfer of the timing of such elections;

3) on election, on the appointment of the position, early termination, suspension or extension of the powers of persons replacing the state positions of the Russian Federation (this applies, for example, the governors of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and ministers);

4) on the personal composition of federal bodies state power, other federal state bodies;

5) on election, on early termination, suspension or extension of the term of authority of bodies formed in accordance with the International Treaty of the Russian Federation;

6) on making emergency and urgent measures to ensure the health and safety of the population;

7) related to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal constitutional laws on the exclusive competence of federal government bodies.

It turns out that the people even through the tool of the Public Initiative (very unreliable tool) will not be able to express their attitude, for example, to the head of the government, which does not cope with the management of the country.

The fourth group of requirements for the initiative is relevance and validity. As far as the public initiative is relevant and how the proposed solution is justified, solves the Information Democracy Foundation. There is no more than two months for the decision of the decision from the Fund. If he deems the solution of the problem is not sufficiently reasonable, or violates other requirements considered above, the public initiative is not posted on the Internet resource. That is, some private structure is the first filter on the path of public initiatives.

How does a public initiative work?

If the public initiative does not violate the established prohibitions, it is posted on the Internet resource. It looks like text with the rationale for the need to solve a certain problem, practical results and specific solutions to the problem. At the same time, the text of the draft legal act and an explanatory note to it can be placed. During the year, voting is held, citizens of Russia who have reached the age of 18, who have presented their passport upon registering on the Public Services portal.

For initiatives of different levels You need to gain different number of votes "for": at the federal level - at least one hundred thousand; at the regional - for regions with a population of over 2 million people - one hundred thousand, for the rest - 5% of the population of the region; At the municipal - 5% of the population of the municipality. You can vote against the initiative, formally they are subsequently not deducted from the votes filed by the "For" initiative. But it can be assumed that a large number of opponents initiative may affect the opinion of the expert working group.

If the initiative supported neighborhood Citizens, it is sent to the expert working group of the appropriate level. For example, at the federal level, he is headed by an expert group Minister for Open Government issues Mikhail Abyzov. This working group is the second filter on the path of the initiative. But not the last. It is the expert working group that decides whether to implement or reject the initiative for two months.

The expert working group of the federal level includes the representatives of the Federal Executive Authorities defined by the Government of the Russian Federation, deputies of the State Duma, members of the Council of Federation, members of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, representatives of the business community and public associations. Principles of formation of working groups of other levels - similar.

The presidential decree does not call any criteria by which the expert group appreciates the initiative approved by citizens. It may be the same criteria that are based on the placement of the initiative on the Internet resource: the relevance of the problem and the validity of its decision (plus support for citizens). In fact, decision expert group May be absolutely arbitrary.

If the expert group has submitted a positive opinion on the public initiative, it also prepares the decision to develop a relevant regulatory legal act or the adoption of other measures to implement the initiative. That is, if the idea needs a federal law to implement the idea, the expert group should decide what to develop and deposit it to the State Duma. Who develops the draft law, and who makes it in the Duma? Probably this task faces the government of the Russian Federation and the federal executive bodies. Anyway, the State Duma or another body will third filter On the path of public initiative.

What are the results?

There are no single statistics on the "swari" site both in areas of concern for citizens and in the ratio of entered and implemented initiatives. Among citizens adopted initiatives are 15 initiatives. Of the 15 initiatives 9 have already been implemented in regulatory legal acts. Of these, 8 federal initiatives were implemented despite the fact that they did not score 100 thousand votes. What does it say about? For example, that the state and so was going to solve the problem declared by citizens (there was no conflict of the type "Citizens require, and the state against"). So, the role of the "swari" site here is zero.

What are these initiatives? Cancellation of the "zero promilla", the abolition of "mobile slavery", the introduction of the possibility of choosing a bank to translate the salary, the introduction of the "diagonal zebra" on pedestrian transitions, permission to make duplicates of state leaders vehicle, other. Some of them are really helpful. big number Citizens, but they all decide only small, private problems - nothing global.

The only realized initiative of the municipal level scored only 2 votes "for" and 3 - "against". Obviously, citizens began to "break through" their initiative in other ways, and the site "swarms" did not help them.

We will look at the initiatives that have gained more than 100 thousand votes, but have not been implemented.

The recent high-profile initiative of Alexei Navalny's ratification of Article 20 of the UN Convention against Corruption, as an inappropriate Constitution of the Russian Federation. How did she even hit the site at all if it does not comply with the requirement of legality? So, the fund is not compentant enough to filter initiatives?But in the case of ratification of Article 20, the UN Convention against Corruption is more interesting than others. Back in 2013, an impressive group of deputies in the amount of more than 100 people made a similar project to ratify Article 20 (No. 216235-6), and this is not the only similar initiative. The bill received negative feedback Government of the Russian Federation and the crushing of legal management, but none of them referred to the unconstitutionality of Article 20 of the Convention. The project remains at the consideration of the State Duma, it is not rejected until now.

Such a picture can demonstrate the fate of the public initiative, the truths or untrue in the walls of the State Duma, but not enjoying the support of power. For example, if the expert group would support the initiative of Navalny, another project would be made to the State Duma. And there the project can marry how long, or just reject. And no matter how many people supported the initiative - 100 thousand or 500 thousand.

In addition, the expert group rejected the initiatives to prohibit officials to buy expensive cars, about the abolition of "flashers" for officials, about the abolition of the "law against the Internet", on the abolition of the law on duties on goods of foreign online stores, as well as the "My Home - My Home" fortress".

Currently, there is a vote on initiatives regarding the change in the rules of paid parking and the abolition of the evacuation of vehicles, which in 4 months have already scored 25 thousand votes. Paid parking and evacuation of cars do not like citizens (mainly Muscovites), but very much like the authorities (Moscow, in particular). Both brings considerable income to the treasury. It is known that the introduction of paid parking and evacuation of machines and the transfer of the corresponding authority to the regions was prolobed by the Moscow authorities. And you can already predict for what grounds this initiative will not pass the "second filter" - an expert group. For example, on the initiative of the ban on "Flashing" in the conclusion of experts, it was said that more than half of the votes were filed by residents of Moscow, another 8 thousand votes - residents of St. Petersburg, which means that it is not relevant for all Russia.

A whole block of initiative reflects the negative attitude of the people to officials and associated oligarchy. These initiatives include the following:

"Develop a reference mechanism by citizens of the Russian Federation public figures all levels ";

"To prohibit the firms of relatives of civil servants and deputies of any rank to participate in state tenders";

"Check the candidate and doctoral dissertations of employees of state corporations, authorities, enterprises with 100% states in plagiarism";

"Fixing in traffic police of the Russian Federation of the responsibility of officials for the state of roads under emergenial situations";

"Specify information on the salaries of officials (with prizes and premiums) over the past 3 months of work on badges, nameplates on cabinets and when quoting the media";

"Establish wages to the heads of state corporations in the amount not exceeding 5 times the size of the average wages employees of this corporation ";

"To prohibit the sale of raw materials and energy resources in the foreign market at prices below the domestic market," and others.

From this brief sample, it can be seen that the people are worried about the irresponsibility of the power and extensibility of the heads of state corporations and officials against the background of the population's depletion. What are the chances that the authorities will meet the people on these issues and will approve the initiatives against themselves? Chances are practically zero.

Why does the "swarms" do not work?

The above analysis of public initiatives, the decision on which was made, led us to a paradoxical conclusion: the state implemented initiatives that did not collect the necessary number of votes, and focus on the initiative supported by more than 100 thousand citizens. Why is that?

The "Roy" project was initiated by the "top", the state itself in the person of the President of the Russian Federation. It implements it close to the state a non-profit organization, which serves as the "first filter" on the way of initiatives. She misses its Internet playground initiatives directed against power. But the following "filters" are already authorities that no longer miss something harmful or what they simply do not agree with.

The very idea of \u200b\u200bthe law-conducting initiative of citizens is not Nova. Even with its introduction in Russia, referred to foreign experience. The practice of civil initiatives is in the USA, the European Union (Lisbon Treaty on Amendments to the EU Constituent Agreements). People's legislative initiative exists in Switzerland, Italy, Australia, Peru, Spain, USA, Germany and is provided for by the constitutions of Albania, Poland, Slovenia, Romania, Latvia and Lithuania.

Project federal Law "On regulatory legal acts in the Russian Federation", developed by the Ministry of Justice of Russia, provides for the possibility of introducing the law-held initiative of citizens at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and municipalities. However, this project has not yet been submitted to the State Duma, and the norms on the law-held initiative of citizens are dispensative, that is, optional. Even the inclusion of the institute of the law-speaking initiative of citizens to the charter of the subject of the Russian Federation does not guarantee the implementation of this institution (this situation has developed, for example, in the Moscow region).

The public initiative differs from the law-minded initiative of citizens by the fact that the second provides for the direct deposits of the draft law to parliament. The Institute of Public Initiative puts additional obstacles to the initiative way.At the same time, the draft regulatory legal act itself is also developed by "society", but by the state. This is a plus, and minus at the same time. On the one hand, citizens do not have the necessary knowledge for independently developing a package of legislative initiative. On the other hand, there is no guarantee that the state in the development of his project will definitely reflect the will of society initiating the project.

The "Roy" project was also criticized for the possible falsification of the results of the votes - the votes of electronic votes, which are confirmed by the identified statistical anomalies. If "swarms" - state projectThe manifestation in it "Churovins" is natural.

With the possible disadvantages of the immediate law-minded initiative of citizens in the legislative bodies, they cannot become an excuse for refusing to such an institution. At the same time, the "Public Initiative" in the current form with its additional "filters" on the path of the wills of citizens may be painless abolished. Although such a public initiative is better than anything in the absence of a direct civil legislative initiative.

The draft Constitution of Russia, developed by the center of Sulakshina, provides for the People's Legislative Initiative. Groups of citizens with election law in the amount of at least 100,000 people have the right to directly make draft laws into parliament in the legislative initiative. This institution for the draft Constitution of Russia acts as one of the guarantees of democracy.

The current authority is not interested in implementing the interests of citizens in the legislation, therefore, there are some fakes like "swarms" imitating democratic institutions. But when the people understand that most of his initiatives are blocked on the controversial reasons, its hostility to power will only increase.

Initiator: Alexey Navalny, Foundation for Combating Corruption

Fate: On February 25, 2015, the Federal Working Group recognized the development of an appropriate regulatory legal act inexpedient. According to its participants, the proposed changes contradict the Russian Constitution. At the same time, the expert opinion states that the Russian Federation agreed on the 20th article of the Convention in full in 2006. This statement was previously challenged and. The working group only recommended that the existing anti-corruption legislation is analyzed. It is worth noting that the final decision on the initiative of the "Open Government" was able to take only from the second time - at the first meeting failed to collect a quorum.

In the spring of 2015, supporters of the initiative attempt to enter into the State Duma proposal to ratify the 20th article through the regional parliaments.

To oblige the Russian Football Union and the Ministry of Sport of Russia to conduct a rating Internet vote on candidates for the position of head coach of the Russian national football team, as well as on candidates for the national football team in front of world competitions

Initiator: anonymously

Fate:At a meeting of the Federal Working Group on June 10, 2015, the idea of \u200b\u200bsuch elections was supported. Despite the negative assessment of the initiative by representatives of the RFU, the Ministry of Sports and the All-Russian Organization of Fans, the expert group supported the idea and recommended a rating vote. "It is proposed to make the result of the Internet voting optional, but recommendatory so that sports officials aware of their responsibility for making a decision and explained their position, in the case of a different choice of Internet voting, it is indicated in the initiatives published on the page. The conclusion of the Group has a recommendatory nature and the RFU will be able to independently accept or not accept the proposals of the Working Group.

Make changes to Labor Code (TK RF), providing for the mandatory indexing of wages of workers at least once a year at a level not lower than the actual inflation

Initiator:Russian trade union of railway workers and transport builders

Fate:On June 10, the Working Group recognized inappropriate introduction to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation of the proposed public initiative

On the Portal "People's Initiative" of the Communist Party of the Communist Party of the Community Petition. To date, she scored 1492 votes from 20,000 necessary.

Mechanisms launched in 2013 by decree of the President of the Russian Public Initiative system (swarms) in need of improvement, especially at the regional and municipal level. In particular, we are talking about the possible simplification of registration of participants in the discussions. And the authorities need to be obliged to take into account the petitions and proposals of citizens in their work or openly argue, why they cannot be taken into account. Such conclusions came the participants of the Council's meeting with the Institutes of Civil Society at the Chairman of the Federation Council. When modernizing this system, it is necessary to take into account the practice of regions on creating services for feedback with citizens, the Minister of the Russian Federation of the Open Government Mikhail Abyzov believes. In order to protect the rights of citizens in conducting public discusses, the open government and the public chamber intend to initiate a number of changes in legislation.

Put forward own initiative Or support any other Roy Portal can every Russian citizen over 18 years old registered on the State Service portal. In order for the federal initiative to be considered, it should gain 100 thousand votes for "for" during the year. The initiatives of the federal level that have received sufficient support of citizens come to the expert working group of the federal level, which the Minister of Russia is headed by Mikhail Abyzov. The treatment threshold of the regional level initiatives for regions with a population of over 2 million is also 100 thousand, for the rest - 5% of the population of the region. For municipalities - 5% of their population.

Since the start of the portal required amount Votes have gained 13 petitions of the federal level, all of them were considered by the expert working group, and the conclusions on the basis of public discussion were sent to the authorities to take into account in their current work. As for the initiatives of the regional and municipal level, none of them was considered by the expert working groups of the relevant level.

Perhaps it is worth thinking about the improvement of the system of classification of public initiatives, it is necessary to understand how much the conclusion of the expert working group is mandatory and final, as the mechanism of public initiative, or not entered into the legislative process. It is worth thinking about the formation of a single electronic system Feedback of the authorities with civil society institutions and increase the confidence of citizens in the effectiveness of the electronic voting system, "Nikolai Fedorov said.

At the federal level, the system as a whole works, however, citizens do not have the opportunity to trace how Mikhail Abyzov agrees to ensure that Mikhail Abyzov agrees.

According to the main proposals that the federal group has developed and sent to the executive authorities, we monitor the quality of their execution. Nevertheless, there are some problems. Not all offers are taken into account in a timely manner and state decisions are developed on their basis. I agree that it is necessary to think about the mechanism, perhaps the obligatory accounting of those proposals that are being developed, "the minister said.

For the implementation of the mechanism at the regional level, he said, all information capabilities were also created, but so far at the level of the subjects of the Russian Federation and the municipalities, the truly swarms and the institutions of petitions did not earn. The reason, according to the minister, is that the system at this level provides for the mandatory identification of citizens through the electronic digital signature system (EDS), and this is difficult and expensive for a simple citizen. This system needs to be upgraded and making more close to consumer requests. simple man, Taking into account the experience of the subjects of the Russian Federation to create services to obtain feedback from citizens, Mikhail Abyzov believes. As an example, he brought the Moscow service "Active Citizen" and the Moscow region "Vrudel", in which the opinion of citizens is taken into account on another, simpler model.

These systems are more comfortable for ordinary people. Moscow and the Moscow region created a good state infrastructure, which properly supports the qualitative implementation of initiatives, proposals and comments that are collected. In itself, the national vote and the collection of proposals will not work if people won't see how power takes into account and for what reason rejects supported initiatives. Taking into account these practices, it is necessary to see what changes can be made to the swarm system, it is possible for regional and municipal modules to change the registration parameters of the main participants. It is necessary to include the leaders of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation more actively in this work, so that the most significant questions are not embarrassed to make a national discussion and receive the very feedback for which the open government system was created, "the minister believes.

Regional officials need to teach the use of such services, Mikhail Abyzov stressed. He recalled that it was previously decided to establish the University of Public Administration of the Government of Moscow courses to teach representatives of regions on working with similar systems. At the same time, the regions can be offered a ready-made "cloud" solution, which will allow them to avoid additional costs to implement and operate electronic services.

The main costs here will be associated with the organization. public service and the creation of another culture of government. We are focused today sometimes to answer automatically, "for a tick", and here you will need to react and clearly indicate how the offer is implemented. To date, it is qualitatively able to make units of the regions: Moscow, Moscow region, Tatarstan and some other subjects of the Russian Federation, "said Mikhail Abyzov.

But for efficient work With citizens, you need to move in all directions: not only to use new technologies, but also to "go" to citizens personally, the minister stressed. Only so, in his opinion, you can significantly change the quality of the decisions taken.

In order to ensure the protection of citizens' rights during various public discusses and accounting for their opinions by the authorities, it is planned to make changes to legislation.

We assume the public chamber to build more effective system contact the initiative to make supplements and clarifications in laws on public control And about the public chamber to provide for the obligation of some rules and procedures, which would more effect the interests of citizens in conducting public discussions, "Mikhail Abyzov said.

The secretary of the Public Chamber Alexander Brechalov, in turn, also noted the importance of working at the regional level, especially with the appeals of citizens. He recalled that in federal legislation there are norms that regulate the work of officials on the appeals of citizens. Meanwhile, as the practice of direct lines with the President of the Russian Federation shows, at the level of the state of the state of complaints, when people turned to all regional level officials, but did not wait for solving the problem.

The public chamber comes more than 25 thousand appeals every year. Almost 70-80% are proposals and problems that can be solved at the regional level. My colleagues with the key indicators of our effectiveness are one of the first items quality of work with citizens' appeals. I believe that we need to strengthen work together in this direction, "said the secretary of the Public Chamber.

The main priorities of the Open Government system were identified in the May Decrees of the President. Per last years, according to Mikhail Abyzov, together with State DumaThe Federation Council and Regions managed to create the foundation of the infrastructure, which makes it possible to take into account citizens on a wide range of government decisions and problems discussed.

What is "Russian Public Initiative" (swari)? Russian public initiative Internet resource for posting public initiatives of citizens of the Russian Federation

Prerequisites 2 Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2012 601 c) Before September 1, 2012, approve the concept of "Russian Public Initiative", which provides for the creation of technical and organizational conditions for the public submission of citizens' proposals using a specialized resource on the Internet from April 15, 2013 G. "... ... We need to provide" Active Law "to enable citizens themselves to form a legislative agenda, to put forward their projects and formulate priorities ... Article 32: ... Citizens of the Russian Federation have the right to participate in the management of the state's business, both directly and through their representatives ... Constitution of the Russian Federation Decisions of the President of the Russian Federation

Today in Russia, the Internet user is a citizen, and a citizen of the Internet user. Time has come ... February 6, 2012 One hundred thousand Likes Prime Minister Vladimir Putin publishes in the newspaper Kommersant article "Democracy and the State of the State" May 7, 2012 Decree 601 Decree provides for the development of the concept of "Russian Public Initiative" August 8, 2012 Round table In RIA Novosti, how should the system of "Russian Public Initiative", August 23, 2012, D. Medvedev approved the concept of swarms October 15, 2012 The Information Democracy Foundation is starting to work on the creation and introduction into the trial operation of the Swari system November, 2012 NGO Forum on the forum " Info Community 2012 "Ilya Massuhov told about his vision of the swarms of November 9, 2012 Open Government discusses the swarms of November 12, 2012 The Council of Human Rights Discussed the mechanisms of electronic democracy and the launch of the Swari System March 4, 2013 Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of March 4, 2013 N 183 "On the consideration of public initiatives ..." April 15,2013 Getting started in accordance with the Presidential Decree of the Russian Federation, the system must be launched at the federal level

Evolution of Internet Democracy: 1. Blogs-Forums 2. Online on the Internet 3.Social networks 4. Signature collection Signatures 5. Agency target projects Evolution of the Internet Community: 1.Giki and programmers 2. «Users» / Educants 3. Blogers 4 Groups in social networks 5.Will citizens Internet services such will be a democracy of tomorrow Civil Consciousness

Municipal RegularForeral Check with the help of a search mechanism Does the initiatives similar to yours are registered on the portal yes fill out the submission of the initiative in your personal account (taking into account the type of initiative) not you can register on a single portal of public services and get a login and password in one day! How to submit an initiative? VOTE

What is needed in order to submit an initiative or vote for the initiative? 1. Being a citizen of Russia over 18 years old. 3. To be registered on the portal to have access to a computer connected to the Internet. 4. Have a formulated initiative in order to offer its power.

1. 2. The resource has a search that can be used to find existing initiatives on a given topic before publishing. Directly when publishing initiatives, the user will also be offered similar initiatives published on the resource. How to exclude the submission of two identical initiatives?

Municipal projectile How to vote for the initiative? Select the initiative and vote for votes are taken into account by experts, but not subtracts from "For" votes. You can register on a single portal of public services and get a login and password in one day! You are registered on the portal and vote

Voting For the initiative of no more than 1 year, it is necessary to recruit at least 100 thousand votes of citizens. Voting for the initiative of no more than 1 year must be scored at least 5% of the population of the relevant subject of the Russian Federation (for the constituent entities of the Russian Federation with a population of more than 2 million - it is necessary to obtain support. No less citizens) Voting for the initiative of no more than 1 year must be scored at least 5% of the population of the relevant municipality how does it work? If your initiative has gained the required number of votes, it will be considered by the state authority you will be able to follow all the stages of the consideration of your initiative municipal project

What is included in the preliminary examination? 2. Check for compliance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, generally accepted principles and norms of international law, including in the field of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens, article 6 FKZ from the city of 5-FKZ "On the referendum". 1. Check for the absence of obscene or offensive expressions, threats to the life or health of citizens, appeals to the implementation of extremist activities. 3. Check for the description of the problem, solving problems, the validity of such options.

Raise the Mrots to the real level of moratorium on increasing housing and utilities tariffs for 10 years to oblige RZhD OJSC obligatory build up the two-level transport interchanges control and substantiation of the need to privatize the introduction of changes to some articles of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on copyright regulation of the number of stray animals 12 federal initiatives from Vologda region

Canceling the permissions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for the export and import of civil arms when crossing the border to limit the export of capital to the ban on the union of the Supreme (Sun) and the highest arbitration (you) courts of Russia to create an independent television one standard for writing the name (and name) Latinov in a foreign passport and other state documents Introduction Anything with a denomination of 200 and 2000 rubles 12 federal initiatives from the Vologda region

1. First Deputy Governor of the region A.I. Sherlugin approved a plan of measures to create a mechanism of public initiative in the field. 2. Defined the deputy senior official of the subject of the Russian Federation responsible for the implementation of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation and the interaction with local governments - Deputy Governor of the region Alexey Yuryevich Makarovsky. What is done in the Vologda region?

3. July 1, 2013 under the Deputy Governor of the region A.Yu. Makarovsky held a meeting on the implementation of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation. 4. In municipal regions and urban districts, expert working groups were created to consider public initiatives of the municipal level.

5. The regulatory legal acts of the region are summarized with the decree of the President of the Russian Federation. Additions to the Regulations of the Government of the Region are made -! A new basis for developing a regulatory act! July 2013 between the Government of the region and the Fund for the Development of Information Democracy and the Civil Society was concluded agreement on cooperation in providing consideration of public initiatives ....

7. Public discussion of the draft Decree of the Government of the Region "On the Regional Expert Working Party for Consideration of Public Initiatives". 8. Preliminary discussion of the draft resolution of the Government of the Region "On RERG POI" at a meeting of the Public Council under the Government of the region. 9. Decision of the Government of the Region from the city of 745 "On the Regional Expert Working Party for Consideration of Public Initiatives" approved the Regulations on the Regional Group and its composition.

September 2013 was attended by the VKS for the implementation of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation at the regional and local level under the leadership of the Assistant President of the Russian Federation. Schegolev of October took place! The first meeting of the regional expert working group on the consideration of public initiatives! October Information about authorized to work in personal Cabinet On the swari sent to the Information Democracy Foundation

13. On October 3, information on the commissioners commissioned in the personal office on the swari sent to the information democracy of October the Governor of the region O.A. Kuvutynikov at a meeting of the expanded Council of the Public Chamber of the region gave the start of the implementation of the Federal Draft "Russian Public Initiative" in the region

October RERG organized a meeting in the ICC mode for Erg of the municipal level on the implementation of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October, a regular meeting was held in the ICC regions with regions to implement the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation

To fulfill the main task, the ERG performs the following functions: 1) conducts an examination and decides on the feasibility of developing a draft relevant regulatory legal act and (or) on other measures to implement public initiative; 2) directs an expert opinion and the decision on the feasibility of developing a draft relevant regulatory legal act and (or) on other measures to implement public initiative to the authority of the region in accordance with its competence; 3) sends an authorized non-profit organization Notice of consideration of the Public Initiative (electronically).

What needs to be done in the Vologda region? 1. Authorized employees register on Gosuslugi.ru and Gosuslugi.ruwww.roi.ru 3. On November 1, 2013, to inform the population about the federal project. 2. To conduct an examination of the municipal act on the expert group of the municipal level.

Address email Secretary of the Expert Group (Direct!) - Working Room and mobile phone Secretary, - Regulation on the expert group and the composition of the expert group. 4. Send until November 15, 2013 on electronic address the following information.