INSTRUCTIONS AND PROPHECIES OF THE Blessed MOTHER ALIPIA GOLOSEEVSKY, Kyiv...
![Instructions and prophecies of the blessed mother Alipia Goloseevskaya, the Kyiv old woman, the holy fool for Christ's sake](https://i1.wp.com/megapoisk.com/uploads/7013271468409176.jpg)
"Blessed gentle poet... "Nikolai Nekrasov
Blessed is the gentle poet,
In whom there is little bile, a lot of feeling:
He is so sincere hello
Friends of calm art;He has sympathy in the crowd,
Like the murmur of waves, caresses the ear;
He is a stranger to self-doubt -
This torture of the creative spirit;Loving carelessness and peace,
Disdainful of impudent satire,
He dominates the crowd
With his peaceful lyre.Marveling at the great mind
He is not driven, not slandered,
And his contemporaries
During his lifetime, a monument is being prepared ...But fate has no mercy
To the one whose noble genius
Became an accuser of the crowd
Her passions and delusions.Breast fed with hatred
Mouth armed with satire,
He walks a thorny path
With his punishing lyre.He is haunted by blasphemy:
He catches the sounds of approval
Not in the sweet murmur of praise,
And in the wild cries of anger.And believing and not believing again
Dream of a high calling,
He preaches love
With a hostile word of denial,And every sound of his speeches
Gives him severe enemies,
And smart and empty people,
Equally stigmatize him ready.From all sides they curse him
And, only seeing his corpse,
How much he did, they will understand
And how he loved - hating!
Nikolai Nekrasov, like many of his predecessors, often wondered what role in society was assigned to the writer. Reflecting on this topic, in 1852 he created the poem "Blessed is the gentle poet ...", dedicated to the anniversary of the death of Nikolai Gogol. The name of the addressee is never mentioned in this work, since by that time Gogol was in disgrace. However, Nekrasov was convinced that Russia had lost one of the greatest Russian writers, whose contribution to literature has yet to be appreciated by posterity.
In his poem, the author draws a clear line between poets whose work is liked by the inhabitants, and those whose poems cause a storm of indignation among readers. He calls the first ones gentle and blissful, since they always live in peace with themselves and with those around them. Their poems are devoid of criticism and sarcasm, but at the same time they do not make people think about the problems that everyone has. Such a poet “strongly dominates the crowd with his peaceful lyre” and at the same time can count on the fact that a monument from grateful admirers will be erected to him during his lifetime. But years will pass, and his work, which does not carry a grain of rationalism, is empty and devoid of true emotions, will sink into oblivion.
The second category of poets are born rebels, who not only see all the vices and shortcomings of society, but also reveal them in their works. Therefore, it is quite natural that no one likes their poems. Even sane people, who realize that every line of such a diatribe poem is designed to change the world for the better, prefer to join the indignant crowd, in which the author is cursed "from all sides". Moreover, he is not taken seriously at all, since the insult from fair, but sometimes very harsh criticism, makes it difficult to realize that there is some truth in the verses.
However, such a poet perceives blasphemy and curses in his address as “sounds of approval”, realizing that he managed to touch the souls of people with poetry, to cause them, albeit negative, but still bright emotions. In his words, sometimes offensive and rude, there is much more love and justice than in the oily speeches of one who prefers laudatory odes to criticism. But, unfortunately, the fate of the rebel poet is always tragic.: having spoken out against society, he can never count on recognition. And only after his death, those who considered such a poet a troublemaker and ignoramus, "how much he did, will understand, and how he loved - hating!"
Nekrasov, like other poets in his work, very often touched on the theme of the poet and poetry, namely the purpose of the poet. That is what this piece is about. The poem was written in 1852, a year after Gogol's death. Many critics find something in common between the idea of this text and the lyrical digression at the beginning of " dead souls”, in the role of a “gentle poet”, according to a number of researchers, Zhukovsky appears. However, we do not find exact references to either of the great literary figures.
The poem is an example of civil lyrics, written in iambic tetrameter with cross-rhyming, it exposes the difficulties that a true poetic genius encounters on its way.
The text can be divided into two parts. In the first case, the author describes wonderful life a poet who is in complete harmony with himself and society. He does not raise burning questions, does not point to human vices, thereby ensuring himself bliss, heavenly life, admiring glances of admirers who perpetuate his genius during his lifetime. But, despite how wonderful his life is, after death, all the works of this poet will disappear without a trace.
In the ideological antithesis, confirmed by the use of specific lexical units (the sweet murmur of rumor - wild cries of anger, the noble genius - the accuser of passions) Nekrasov draws a different poet. This person is a rebel by all nature, he does not intend to put up with the injustice and imperfection of human society. He declares this openly, sometimes even in a very caustic way, which is extremely disliked by people. They do not admire his creations, on the contrary, they scold him. The poet even considers his work in vain, useless to anyone. But everything passes, and the branding of the crowd does not at all sadden the poet, because this is a sign that he managed to reach out to their minds and hearts.
Yes, the life of such a poet is full of difficulties, he may remain misunderstood by anyone until his death, but after it he will certainly gain eternal glory, thanks to his work. And, despite the fact that Nekrasov describes the life of a non-malicious poet with a feeling of envy, he has true sympathy for the poet-exile, which he himself is. After all, it is precisely such a creator who is able to bring true benefit to society, and this and only this is the mission of the poet!
Briefly according to the plan
Yesenin's poem "The fields are compressed, the groves are bare" was written in 1917, in these small quatrains written by the poet, the theme of deep autumn is touched upon, all its melancholy and sadness. After all, in autumn, all living things gradually fall asleep,
This poem was written in 1835. Tyutchev then worked as a chamberlain and lived abroad. It should be noted that almost all of the poet's poems are small in size, elegant and have a deep philosophical meaning. On the poet
The bright and mysterious star of Yevgeny Abramovich Baratynsky's talent lit up in the poetic firmament of Russia in the first half of the 19th century. The expulsion of Yevgeny Abramovich from the Corps of Pages abruptly changed the fate of the future poet
Dedicated too many works love lyrics Pushkin. He was such a temperamental and loving person that he simply could not restrain himself so as not to describe his feelings. Boldinskaya autumn, like a whole creative
Undoubtedly, the cycle of poems with civil themes can be called the crowning achievement of Pushkin's poetry. It is to this category that one of the most famous poems A. S. Pushkin "To Chaadaev".
“Blessed is the embittered poet” is a polemical poem expressing one of the views on the generation of the 19th century and the role of the poet in society. At school, it is studied in the 10th grade. We offer you to quickly and efficiently prepare for the lesson using brief analysis"Blessed is the embittered poet" according to the plan.
History of creation- the poem was written in 1872 as a response to the verse by N. A. Nekrasov "Blessed is the gentle poet."
Theme of the poem- the relationship of the poet and society, the role of poetic art in public life.
Composition- The poem by Y. Polonsky is a monologue-reasoning of a lyrical hero, which can be conditionally divided into two parts. In the first, the poet is in the center of attention, in the second - the poet and the generation of his contemporaries. The work is not divided into stanzas.
Genre- civic poetry.
Poetic size - iambic tetrameter, cross rhyme ABAB, in the last four lines rhyme ring ABBA.
Metaphors – "a moral cripple", "children of an embittered age", "suffering under the yoke of obvious contradictions", "in love - germs of ideas".
epithets – "embittered poet", "prophetic verse", "respectable husband", "involuntary cry".
Comparisons – “he shakes the darkness like a titan”, “he… like we are poisoned…”.
Literature knows many examples of disputes between poets that developed on the basis of topical problems: the tasks of verbal creativity, its role in the development of society, artistic features. This list is far from complete. In the first half of the 19th century, a controversy broke out between adherents of the Gogol and Pushkin trends. This was the impetus for the writing by N. Nekrasov of the program poem “Blessed is the Gentle Poet” in 1852. The history of the creation of the analyzed work is connected with these events.
Y. Polonsky did not belong to any direction, but he soon entered into a creative polemic with Nekrasov. In 1872, the poet wrote the polemical verse "Blessed is the Embittered Poet", based on the work of Nekrasov. There are two versions of Polonsky's poem. The first option was not accepted by all journals due to the acute characteristics of the generation. The poet noted that he had nothing against Nekrasov, and the controversy was directed at some of his views.
The analyzed work reveals the eternal problem of the poet and society, their relationship. The author shows that the poet's personality develops in a social environment, and if the master of the word is brought up in the midst of malice and bitterness, then he himself becomes embittered. Y. Polonsky observes this state of affairs with irony, and sometimes with contrition.
The lyrical hero of the poem is a representative of the "children of an embittered age". From the position of his generation, he characterizes the poet, trying to find in him best features. The hero considers the poet blessed who became embittered, even if his morality was crippled. Such a master of words never stops, does not give up, he is constantly trying to find a way out. The lyrical hero considers him strong, therefore he compares him with a titan. An embittered poet does not obey his heart or other people, he is guided only by his mind. He does not even submit to the gods, and with his poems he is able to alarm even “solid men”.
The ideal poet, according to Y. Polonsky, incorruptible, does not like hypocrisy. Its strength is in denial and unshakable ideas born in love. The main reason why the people follow the “embittered poet” is that his cry and vices merge with the people. Together with the people, he drank poison from a common cup.
The poem is divided in meaning into two parts: in the first, the author creates the image of an "embittered poet", in the second, he supplements this characteristic with a description of the society in which this same poet lives. The first part is much larger than the second, both of them are closely intertwined and are a single whole. There is no formal division into couplets in the poem.
The genre of the work is civil lyrics, as the author reflects in the poem on topical issue. The poetic size is iambic tetrameter. Ya. Polonsky uses the cross rhyme ABAB, and in the last lines - the ring rhyme. There are both male and female rhymes in the verse.
Plays the main role metaphor: "a moral cripple", "children of an embittered age", "suffering under the yoke of obvious contradictions", "in love - germs of ideas". The picture is completed epithets: "embittered poet", "prophetic verse", "respectable husband", "involuntary cry".
comparisons there are only two in the text: “he, like a titan, shakes the darkness”, “he ... like we are poisoned ...”.
Expressive means emphasize the mood of the lyrical hero and the author. In some stanzas, an emotional background is created with the help of alliteration, for example, the consonants "s", "c": "Poison in the depths of his passions, salvation in the power of denial".
Nikolai Nekrasov, like many of his predecessors, often wondered what role in society was assigned to the writer. Reflecting on this topic, in 1852 he created a poem "Blessed is the gentle poet ...", dedicated to the anniversary of the death of Nikolai Gogol. The name of the addressee is never mentioned in this work, since by that time Gogol was in disgrace. However, Nekrasov was convinced that Russia had lost one of the greatest Russian writers, whose contribution to literature has yet to be appreciated by posterity.
In his poem, the author draws a clear line between poets whose work is liked by the inhabitants, and those whose poems cause a storm of indignation among readers. He calls the first ones gentle and blissful, since they always live in peace with themselves and with those around them. Their poems are devoid of criticism and sarcasm, but at the same time they do not make people think about the problems that everyone has. Such a poet “strongly dominates the crowd with his peaceful lyre” and at the same time can count on the fact that a monument from grateful admirers will be erected to him during his lifetime. But years will pass, and his work, which does not carry a grain of rationalism, is empty and devoid of true emotions, will sink into oblivion.
The second category of poets are born rebels, who not only see all the vices and shortcomings of society, but also reveal them in their works. Therefore, it is quite natural that no one likes their poems. Even sane people, who realize that every line of such a diatribe poem is designed to change the world for the better, prefer to join the indignant crowd, in which the author is cursed “from all sides”. Moreover, he is not taken seriously at all, since the insult from fair, but sometimes very harsh criticism, makes it difficult to realize that there is some truth in the verses.
However, such a poet perceives blasphemy and curses in his address as “sounds of approval”, realizing that he managed to touch the souls of people with poetry, to evoke in them, albeit negative, but still vivid emotions. In his words, sometimes offensive and rude, there is much more love and justice than in the oily speeches of one who prefers laudatory odes to criticism. But, unfortunately, the fate of the rebel poet is always tragic: having spoken out against society, he can never count on recognition. And only after his death, those who considered such a poet a troublemaker and an ignoramus, “will understand how much he did, and how he loved - hating!”.
(No Ratings Yet)
3 796 0
Nikolai Nekrasov, like many of his predecessors, often wondered what role in society was assigned to the writer. Reflecting on this topic, in 1852 he created a poem dedicated to the anniversary of the death of Nikolai Gogol. The name of the addressee is never mentioned in this work, since by that time Gogol was in disgrace. However, he was convinced that Russia had lost one of the greatest Russian writers, whose contribution to literature has yet to be appreciated by posterity.
In his poem, the author draws a clear line between poets whose work is liked by the inhabitants, and those whose poems cause a storm of indignation among readers. He calls the first ones gentle and blissful, since they always live in peace with themselves and with those around them. Their poems are devoid of criticism and sarcasm, but at the same time they do not make people think about the problems that everyone has. Such a poet “strongly dominates the crowd with his peaceful lyre” and at the same time can count on the fact that a monument from grateful admirers will be erected to him during his lifetime. But years will pass, and his work, which does not carry a grain of rationalism, is empty and devoid of true emotions, will sink into oblivion.
The second category of poets are born rebels, who not only see all the vices and shortcomings of society, but also reveal them in their works. Therefore, it is quite natural that no one likes their poems. Even sane people, who realize that every line of such a diatribe poem is designed to change the world for the better, prefer to join the indignant crowd, in which the author is cursed "from all sides". Moreover, he is not taken seriously at all, since the insult from fair, but sometimes very harsh criticism, makes it difficult to realize that there is some truth in the verses.
However, such a poet perceives blasphemy and curses in his address as “sounds of approval”, realizing that he managed to touch the souls of people with poetry, to evoke in them, albeit negative, but still vivid emotions. In his words, sometimes offensive and rude, there is much more love and justice than in the oily speeches of one who prefers laudatory odes to criticism. But, unfortunately, the fate of the rebel poet is always tragic: having spoken out against society, he can never count on recognition. And only after his death, those who considered such a poet a troublemaker and ignoramus, "how much he did, will understand, and how he loved - hating!"
If this material there is no information about the author or source, which means that it was simply copied on the Internet from other sites and presented in the collection for information purposes only. AT this case the lack of authorship suggests accepting what is written as just someone's opinion, and not as the ultimate truth. People write a lot, make a lot of mistakes - this is natural.