Full frame. What to choose? Crop or full frame

Cameras with a full frame sensor ("full frame" cameras) are in great demand today. More and more more people moving from crop factor cameras to cameras with a large 35mm sensor. Today we will try to understand why.

What is a full frame camera

First, we need to understand what a full frame camera is and how it differs from a crop factor camera. These terms - "full frame" and "crop factor" - refer to one specific part of the camera: the sensor. Just as the film is responsible for capturing images on a film camera, so the camera's matrix is ​​designed to record images on modern digital cameras. In combination with the shutter, mirror and lens, the sensor is a key part of the imaging system.

Camera sensors vary in size. Camera matrices in phones are even smaller than those built into most "soap dishes". In general, the larger the sensor, the better quality Images.

The full frame sensor is so named because it is the same size as a full frame of 35mm film. You may have never shot film, but you should know what it looks like. Examples of full frame cameras are Nikon D700 and Canon 5D. Cameras with crop factor have smaller sensors, "crop" (from the English "crop"), i.e. stripped down. An example is Nikon cameras D40, D7000 and Canon Rebel T2i and 60D.

The picture above perfectly illustrates the difference between full frame cameras and crop factor cameras. The whole image is what your eye sees. The area framed by the red rectangle is what a camera with a full frame sensor perceives. The smaller area inside the blue box is what we will see through the same lens, but on a crop factor camera.

The sizes of sensors can be completely different. Crop factor cameras are often referred to as "APS-C" (Canon's Digital Rebel range). The size between full frame and APS-C is commonly referred to as APS-H. These are also cameras with a crop factor (sensor smaller size frame in 35mm film), but their sensor is larger than in APS-C cameras. At the moment, APS-H cameras are generally limited to the Canon 1D line, such as the 1D Mark IV. If you are interested in learning more technical details about camera sensors, take a look at.

Full Frame Benefits

Now that we have a better idea of ​​what full frame cameras are, let's take a look at a few features that make them so attractive.

Viewfinder

In my opinion, the main advantage of full-frame cameras is the quality of the viewfinder. If you've ever used an old film SLR, you've probably been impressed by the size and brightness of the viewfinder. Moreover, one of the disadvantages of crop factor DSLRs is the relatively small viewfinder. Full-frame cameras excel at this.

Now that I have a full frame camera, looking through the viewfinder of a crop factor camera, I kind of feel like I'm looking into a tunnel. If you've never checked out how a full-frame viewfinder works, give it a try. With it, it is much easier to manually focus the lens and control the areas of sharpness in comparison with crop factor opponents.

Focal length

You are probably aware of the focal length multiplication effect that crop factor cameras have.

I prefer the view that a full frame camera provides because I like wide perspectives. On my full frame 5D, I often use a 24mm f/1.4 lens for weddings. On a crop factor camera, this lens will have an effective focal length of 36mm. To reproduce a similar picture, you would need to find a 16mm lens for a crop factor camera; the 16mm f/1.4 fix doesn't even exist. In short, fast wide-angle lenses are much easier to use at full frame.

High ISO

If there's one measure of performance that I really appreciate in a full frame camera, it's shooting at high ISOs. A larger sensor has technical advantages. talking in simple terms, a larger sensor allows the manufacturer not to cram photocells into it, and therefore the camera is able to shoot at higher ISOs. The photocells can be larger and each will be able to take in more light.

Canon and Nikon approach this issue differently. Nikon releases cameras with larger sensor sizes, but keeps the megapixel count pretty low, and really delivers amazingly high ISO performance in their cameras. Nikon D700, D3 and D3s are 12 megapixels, but they can take amazingly high-quality pictures. Canon also makes full-frame cameras with outstanding ISO performance, but is taking the high-resolution path with the 21-megapixel 5D Mark II. The Sony lineup also includes cameras of this type, the A850 and A900.

In general, full-frame cameras will please you with high ISO values ​​due to bigger size sensor. There are many different manufacturers on the market, so there is something for everyone.

Flaws

Full frame cameras are not for everyone; Some photographers choose crop factor cameras for a variety of reasons. Let's look at some of them.

Reach area

Remember, above, we talked about the effect of the multiplied focal length of the lens that a camera with crop factor gives? For some photographers, the increased reach of the lens is a major advantage. For example, in the case of sports or wildlife photographers, getting closer is always a big plus. A photographer friend of mine once remarked that shooting with a crop factor camera is like getting a free 1.6x teleconverter.

This is a teleconverter manufactured by Canon. It increases the focal length to provide greater zoom. This is the same effect that is obtained when shooting on cameras with a crop factor.

Price

The acquisition of good equipment always hits the pocket. Although full-frame cameras are becoming more popular, and therefore more available options. On the this moment each manufacturer's flagship offering is the expensive full-frame model.

Many people assume that the more popular full-frame cameras become, the lower the price will go until it eventually returns to normal levels. Given the benefits of full frame, it's not hard to imagine that all DSLR cameras will be full frame for the foreseeable future. The technology will fall in value and could easily become the standard offering on the market.

The advantage of the full frame is that, because there are fewer full frame models available, they can be purchased in the used market for best price compared to crop factor cameras.

Go to full frame

So you've decided you're ready to go full frame - what should you choose? If you've already invested in a particular system, it makes sense to keep using the same system and stick with a full-frame camera from the same manufacturer.

As discussed above, full frame has many advantages. However, cost can be an insurmountable barrier for many people. If you're looking for the least expensive option to upgrade to a full frame system, check out a used Canon 5D that can cost up to $1,000.

Many people make the mistake of putting all their available budget into the body of a camera. Before you upgrade to a system with a full frame sensor, make sure you have lenses that will take full advantage of your new camera. Check the compatibility of your camera and available lenses.

For example, Nikon DX lenses are not compatible with full-frame cameras like the D700. If you try to use them on such a device, you will get shadowed corners, a vignetting effect. On a Canon system, EF-S lenses will not work on full frame cameras such as the 5D.

All of the shots above are taken on a full frame camera, but at varying degrees of zoom to illustrate the differences between images produced by the same lens at different sensor crop factors. The top shot was shot at 70mm full frame - hence there is no crop factor multiplier. Below is a frame with a crop factor of 1.3x. 70mm times 1.3 is equivalent to about 91mm. Finally, the bottom frame shows what the same 70mm would look like on a camera with a crop factor of 1.6x, which is about 112mm.

As already mentioned, you need to choose compatible lenses, but in addition, you should also pay attention to those lenses that can convey all the advantages of a large sensor. Often full-frame cameras are models with high resolution, such as 21 megapixel 5D Mark II. The use of cheap and poor quality lenses negates any of the image quality improvements that a full frame camera can provide. We need good lenses to bring out all the details of these high resolution quality sensors.

I'm sure you've heard this tip before: build a lens collection first. I sincerely believe in this rule ... even though I am guilty of breaking it. My lens collection couldn't keep up with the cost of upgrading my camera. If I were to go through this again, I would first form a set of good lenses on a crop factor camera and then move on to a full frame model. If you think you'll be moving to a full-frame sensor system very soon, remember to choose lenses that suit that purpose.

Conclusion

A full frame DSLR is an amazing tool, but it's just a tool, nothing more. With many great benefits, it can help you get better results when shooting in low light. More and more cameras with full frame sensors are becoming available, so this is definitely the format of the future for professionals.

@talentonatural77

We've rounded up the top 10 full-frame DSLRs for 2018. Studio heavyweights optimal for enthusiasts and two cameras for photojournalists.

Despite the fact that mirrorless cameras are coming, do not write off DSLRs ahead of time. In this selection, we have included mid-range and top-level SLR cameras.

1. Nikon D850

Nikon D850 is the company's flagship and, according to the editors, the best SLR camera on the market.

The 45.4MP full-frame sensor delivers stunningly sharp images with a huge dynamic range and high working ISO. Fast autofocus is worked out by a system of 153 points. 4K video shooting is available with all the necessary

Nikon's signature deep-grip, water-resistant design and touch-sensitive swivel display provide a superior user experience.

A 30.4MP sensor and 61-point autofocus make this camera an excellent choice for professionals. With this resolution, you can shoot footage of any genre and not suffer from a clogged disk.

The Canon EOS 5D Mark IV is one of the best SLR cameras available today. Although it lost the top of the chart to the D850.

3. Nikon D810

Despite the release of the D850, this model is still a very powerful tool.

36.3 MP sensor, high detail, no AA filter, wide dynamic range and 1200 frames on one battery. The camera copes with scenes of any complexity thanks to the 51-point autofocus system from the reportage D4S.

It doesn't have a swivel display, Wi-Fi, and 4K, but it remains an excellent studio and reportage camera with moisture protection and high resolution.

4 Canon EOS 5DS

If you want to get the maximum resolution, then you should choose the Canon 5DS with its 50.6 megapixel sensor. Today it is the highest resolution among SLR cameras.

Stunning detail, low noise and good dynamic range make this camera ideal for the studio and landscape photographer.

The downside is slowness, lack of Wi-Fi and 4k video, and, of course, huge files requiring huge memory cards and hard drives.

5. Nikon D750

The first four places were taken by very expensive cameras. On the 4th place is the Nikon D750, the main advantage of which is an affordable price.

The camera is equipped with a 24.3-megapixel sensor, a 51-point autofocus system and a high working ISO. D810 water and dust resistant camera body, tilting display and built-in Wi-Fi.

Nikon D750 is a harmonious and affordable full-frame SLR camera.

6. Sony Alpha A99 II

Strictly speaking, the Sony A99 II is a pseudo-DSLR, it is equipped with a translucent mirror and an electronic viewfinder. But still, it is half a DSLR and therefore falls into our selection.

12 fps autofocus, 42.2-megapixel back-illuminated sensor, built-in image stabilizer and extensive 4k shooting capabilities.

The flagship and best SLR camera for a photojournalist. D5 is attached to lenses at the Olympics and various world championships.

Everything in the camera is subordinated to one goal - to take the right shot. Matrix 20.8 megapixels, shooting speed 12 frames per second, never before seen maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,280,000. Autofocus system with 173 points.

The ability to shoot video in 4k is limited to 3 minutes. But these are trifles.

A photojournalist chooses a camera based on the system his news agency works with.

The Canon 1D X Mark II received a 20.2 megapixel sensor, 61 focus points and a shooting speed of 14 frames per second, which is faster than the D5.

The camera does not boast a huge maximum ISO, here it is weaker than D5, but nevertheless low light The camera produces a high-quality image even at high values.

9 Canon EOS 6D Mark II

The characteristics of the 6D Mark II are quite simple. 26.2MP sensor, 45 AF points, swivel touch display and great job autofocus in Live View.

Of the minuses, a weak dynamic range and autofocus with a small frame coverage.

The company has done a lot of work on the 6D Mark II and has made a nice camera for enthusiasts who want to upgrade to a full frame camera.

10. Pentax K-1 mark II

This is a unique and controversial SLR camera.

The Pentax K-1 mark II features a proven 36-megapixel sensor with good dynamic range, strong weather protection, built-in GPS, handheld Pixel Shift shooting, and a host of features not available on other cameras on the market.

However, it also has a lot of weaknesses. The shooting speed is limited to 4.4 frames per second, there is no 4k video recording, the autofocus zone does not cover the entire frame.

P.S.

All of these models have mirrorless cameras breathing down their backs. At the moment, the market for full-frame mirrorless cameras is represented by the Sony A7R III and models, which by their third iteration have become close to ideal. Plus the first reportage Sony A9. You will not see it in stadiums yet, but partly this is due to logistics.

Very soon, or rather, on August 23, they will be joined by the first full-frame mirrorless Nikon Z, and after it the full-frame Canon. The timing of the announcement of the latter is not known, but there is evidence that Canon is trying its best to make it as soon as possible.

At the same time, do not forget mirrorless cameras with APS-C matrices. They become serious players. Especially Fujifilm with their X-H1 (check it out, she's cool) and the future we expect to see on .

More and more amateur photographers are now turning their attention to cameras with full-frame sensors, which should provide better image detail, smooth transitions in the midtone zone and a greater sense of “depth”. However, a wide variety of myths and misinformation are associated with full-frame matrices. What are the main features and advantages of cameras with a full-frame sensor, and is it worth changing a regular camera with a crop sensor to an expensive full-frame model? We will talk about this in this article.

Full frame sensor

But first, let's define what a "full frame" is. We are talking about the physical size of the photosensitive matrix used in digital camera. She, as you know, is responsible for the quality of the image. Full frame cameras are those that have the same sensor size as a 35mm film camera with a size of 36 x 24mm.

At the beginning of the development of digital photography, almost all devices had a light-sensitive sensor of a smaller format due to the emergence of technology and the too high cost of producing full-frame sensors. However, over time, the production of full-frame sensors has become less expensive, which has allowed leading manufacturers to offer full-frame cameras to users.

Although the price for them cannot be called low today, nevertheless, such full-frame cameras have become much more affordable. Examples of full-frame cameras are Sony SLT A99 or Nikon D700.

Matrices with a crop factor, that is, with reduced physical dimensions, are usually referred to as APS-C sensors. Nikon, however, uses its own designations: "FX" for full-frame models and "DX" for cameras with cropped matrices. Typically, a crop sensor is 1.5 to 1.6 times smaller than a full-frame sensor. However, today cameras are produced with matrices having a variety of physical sizes.

Naturally, the majority of cameras with truncated matrices are in mass sale, they are cheaper and more convenient for beginners. If you shoot an image with a normal full-frame lens and superimpose it on a cropped sensor, then the image at the edges will be cropped by about thirty percent, that is, it will be one and a half times smaller. The number 1.5 is called the crop factor. Each manufacturer of photographic equipment has its own, but on average it varies within exactly 1.5 - 1.6.

As we know, back in the era of film photography, it was generally accepted that the larger the negative, the better and more detailed the image will be. A full-frame sensor is on average one and a half times wider than an APS-C sensor and, of course, this cannot but affect the image quality. What are the benefits of full frame?

Features and Benefits of Full Frame Sensors

First of all, a feature of cameras with full-frame sensors is the viewfinder scale, which is noticeably larger than that of conventional cameras with a cropped sensor. This, in turn, provides excellent opportunities for convenient selection of shooting parameters and angles. But the most important advantage of full-frame sensors is, of course, the ability to get sharper and better images at high ISO values, with much less digital noise.

Large full-frame sensor allows you to "shove" into it large quantity photocells, and even larger ones, which positively affects the perception of the light flux. Therefore, for the same number of megapixels, a full-frame camera will always provide better results at high ISO values ​​than a conventional crop sensor camera. You have the opportunity to seriously increase the ISO value when shooting, while you do not have to worry that the noise in the image will become visible.

The difference between a full-frame sensor and a crop sensor also shows up in the effect of increasing the focal length. The cropped sensor captures a smaller area of ​​the image, so the final picture looks like you were using a lens with a longer focal length. That is, on crop, the equivalent focal length increases in proportion to the crop factor.

For example, if you use a 50mm lens on a camera with an APS-C sensor, your photos will look like they were taken with a 75mm lens (crop factor = 1.5). That is, in the case of APS-C cameras, increasing the equivalent focal length can work in your favor. It is impossible to talk about the unequivocal advantage of a full-frame camera here, because everything depends solely on what you are going to shoot. Someone needs a full-frame camera to shoot a wide perspective, and someone wants to achieve a closer approximation of the objects being shot, and therefore it is more expedient for him to use a camera with a cropped matrix.

Shooting with a full-frame camera adds a strong sense of depth to images. This effect is achieved due to the shallow depth of field. As a general rule, on a full-frame camera, you need to close down the aperture by about 1/3 stop in order to get the same depth of field as with a camera that has a crop sensor. AT optimal conditions full-frame cameras are also able to provide images with better detail and greater dynamic range due to the increased number of light sensors.

However, all these advantages of full-frame cameras are offset by the use of old or cheap lenses with them. If you decide to upgrade to a full frame camera, be prepared to invest heavily in new lenses that are compatible with full frame. You should pay attention to the optics that can convey all the advantages of a large sensor. The use of cheap and low-quality lenses negates any improvement in image quality that a full-frame sensor can bring with it.

Each manufacturer of photographic equipment currently produces optics separately for full-frame cameras and cameras with truncated matrices. For example, EF-S and EF lenses can be mounted on Canon amateur cameras, the choice of which is very diverse. For full-frame models, a limited set of EF optics is provided. That is, for a full frame, the available optics fleet is less.

But some of these lenses have characteristics that are almost inaccessible to the crop. Accordingly, specialized and high-quality optics for full-frame cameras can really emphasize all aspects of the performance of large high-resolution sensors.

Disadvantages of full frame cameras

As already noted, the effect of changing the focal length on crop matrices can be a serious advantage for the photographer and a decisive criterion when choosing photographic equipment. All you have to do is take a 300mm f/2.8 lens and mount it on a crop sensor camera and you actually get a 450mm f/2.8 lens.

That is, the crop factor allows you to achieve an increased reach of the lens with significant savings. Therefore, conventional crop-sensor cameras can be very useful, for example, when shooting animals in natural environment habitation, photographing sports competitions or reportage photography.

But the main stumbling block is still the cost of full-frame cameras. Models with full-frame sensors are still much more expensive than conventional ones, and therefore the question invariably arises as to the advisability of buying them. Full frame cameras tend to be the flagship products of any leading camera manufacturer. The acquisition of such equipment always hits the pocket. Moreover, when buying a full-frame camera, you will most likely have to buy additional lenses, because not all optics from crop cameras are compatible with full frame cameras, and vice versa.

Due to the high cost, buying a full-frame camera for amateur photography is unlikely to be appropriate. For professional photographers, the advantages of a full frame compared to the cost of a camera are much more justified. In addition, experienced photographers know better how to properly use the features of a full frame sensor. Amateur photographers will have to improve their shooting technique when switching to full frame.

So, "full frame" due to the increase in the size of the receiving cell reduces the noise level at high ISO sensitivity, expands the dynamic range and increases the image detail. In addition, the lens on a full-frame camera gives a wider field of view, which can be required in many shooting situations. But if you decide to change your camera to a camera with a full-frame sensor, you should clearly understand for what purposes you will need it. Before buying a "full frame"

You also need to make sure you have compatible lenses so that you can take full advantage of your new camera. Beginning photographers often make a huge mistake by investing their entire budget in buying a more perfect and advanced camera, completely forgetting that it is not the camera that shoots, but the lens.

For half a year now I have been quite a happy owner of a Canon EOS 6D and, having shot more than 15,000 frames during this time, I can reliably tell you about its pros and cons. But first, a little about their activities and the reason for the purchase.

I am a professional photographer in small town. I specialize in family, children, studio, wedding, fashion photography and related areas of photography. At the beginning of the summer of 2016, my old Canon 500D broke down, which served me faithfully for 8 (!) years, there was no point in repairing such an old camera, the savings did not allow me to aim at 5Dm3, but I really wanted to switch to ff - under these conditions, the choice was obvious and only one.

The camera cost me about 86,000 (against about 105,000 in stores official partners, i.e. from suppliers of "white" equipment, at that time). No, it was not bought from the famous Indians at VDNKh. The discount of almost 20 thousand was obtained due to the cashback from Canon that has already become an annual and coupons from the Svyaznoy store, Googled in 10 minutes. Now the camera can be purchased even cheaper if you follow the same pattern. Well, or contact the shops with gray equipment.

General impressions of the camera: I am completely satisfied with it, enough for work, new opportunities have opened up. But you need to understand that the camera is NOT INTENDED for dynamic reporting. I was slightly shocked by some reviews in which people complain about focusing or rate of fire - my dears, this is all indicated in the characteristics of the camera, why buy a device that has nothing to do with your occupation, and then blame the mirror?

For leisurely creative shooting, it fits perfectly! At the end of the review, I will tell you how not to make a mistake when choosing a camera and what to look for when buying.

What pleased 6D?

1. Good working ISOs

This is the most important plus and an inexhaustible source of joy for me. With my old camera, I could not even dream of shooting at ISO 2000-4000, which means that entire genres were closed to me, and the picture in dimly lit rooms was indigestible. Now everything has changed, I have gained greater freedom, in the twilight of the restaurant I no longer necessarily grab the flash, in simple Soviet apartments there is enough light from the window, you can safely experiment with night photo shoots and even astrophotography. But pictures can speak better than a thousand words:

Shot in a closed church, overcast day, the only light source is a medium-sized window:

At 100% magnification:

The quality for web use, personal album and even A4 printing is more than acceptable.

And here is a photo from a report from the arrival of the husband of my regular client from the army. The train arrived at one in the morning, from the illumination only city illumination:

Same source + flash on the ground from behind:

Light from a curtained window:

Suddenly, during the shooting, a strong thunderstorm began, in the blink of an eye it became dark, like in the late evening, heavy rain was pouring:

The only source of light is candles:

I think you understood my idea. With high ISOs, the camera is very friendly! Of course, porridge is already starting at 8000, but this range is enough for this range to work. With this camera, for the first time, it was possible to see Milky Way without leaving the city!

2. Full frame and all that comes with it

Wide-angle lenses have finally become wide-angle lenses, and to use my favorite 135mm from canon, you no longer need to wind up 5km per shot. In general, the legs rest

I almost never part with this lens, so this is important to me. Now sometimes even manage to fit in with him in a cramped studio. Some examples of photos with my pet and 6D:

3.GPS and WiFi

Filming takes me to the craziest places, not only in my hometown, but all over Russia, and sometimes beyond, so keeping track of the map of my movements is a kind of little game for me. But unfortunately, GPS noticeably affects the camera’s operating time without recharging, so I don’t always keep it on. Often I take one or two shots in a new place with GPS turned on, so that I have a mark that "I was here"

GPS is very accurate, it determines the location with an accuracy of a meter, you can then see what happened on the shooting using the map tab in lightroom or a program from canon.

Here is a map from one of my photo days at one stable, it is clear that I ran pretty much in 8 hours of shooting:

4.Other nice little things

• The raw files are noticeably smaller than on my old camera, while the resolution is higher.
• Long-lasting battery (quietly withstands an entire wedding or several smaller shoots without recharging)
• Uses SD cards (this is a plus for me, since there are a lot of SD cards left from 500D and I didn’t have to buy cards of a different format)
• 3 different resolutions for raw (very handy when you know exactly what big photos not boring)

And now for the bad:

I will not find fault with the design and layout of the buttons (especially since it clearly wins in comparison with the 5Dm3), since this is a matter of individual preferences and a matter of habit. The first time was hard, changing the settings required a few seconds of "stupidity" on my part, since the control was radically different from my previous camera. But this is a matter of practice, now I already feel quite comfortable with him.

All of the above minuses in working in my genres do not interfere, so my rating for the camera is 4.75, rounded up to 5.

And now some photos different conditions lighting.

The perfect golden hour

And now about how to choose a camera and not make a mistake.

The first question you should ask yourself is "who am I and why do I need a camera?".

Everything else will depend on the answer to this question. Here are the answers that come to my mind:

1) You are an amateur photographer, you know little about the technical side of photography, you need a camera to

• film family, children, gatherings with friends, parties, in general, for social purposes. In this case, you definitely don't need a 6D, even if your friend has it and you like the photos from it. For these purposes, there are more budget solutions that are no worse and do not weigh more than a kilogram with a lens. Pay attention to the most budget models of DSLRs, and spend the saved money on a good fast lens and on-camera flash, in your case much more will depend on them than on the camera. You can look at used cameras.
• to shoot while traveling, hiking, trips, in general for tourist purposes. You don't need 6D either. Pay attention to mirrorless cameras with interchangeable lenses, when collecting suitcases, long walks and on mountain trails, size will matter and every gram will count. The motivation to carry around 1.5kg of photographic equipment quickly disappears when you take a 10-kilometer walk in a mountainous area.
• shoot for yourself - macro, subject matter, portraits, in general, for creative purposes. For you, I have the same advice as for the first point - a budget DSLR + a good lens. 6D is worth buying only if the lion's share of your creativity is shooting in low light and the budget allows.

2) You are a professional or are going to become one in the near future, you need a camera to

• shoot a report sports events, club parties, etc., in general, everything that is in constant motion. 6D will not suit you at all and its characteristics just scream about it. Pay attention to the number of frames per second, the fastest shutter speed, the focusing system, and then choose according to your budget, reportage cameras sometimes cost half a million. Don't skimp on memory cards, as they too can affect burst shooting speed.
• shoot portraits in the studio or outdoors, subject, macro, in general, everything that allows you to shoot thoughtfully and slowly. 6D is perfect for these purposes for professionals of any level. In some circles, a somewhat snobbish attitude has developed towards him, they say, not the most serious camera for a professional, but in my opinion this is a delusion, and thousands of professionals will support me in this. However, if you are a beginner photographer, I would advise you to pay attention to more budget crops, you will always have time to change the camera when you realize that you feel cramped on the crop, but if you immediately invest in a full frame and, as a result, you don’t have it will turn out, it will be a shame, and the camera will not be suitable for home purposes. Invest in lenses and lighting equipment - they play a much larger role in the final picture than the camera itself, and a full frame is not Magic wand and won't automatically make your photos better, just keep practicing and learning, and go to expensive equipment always make it.

In summary, I will say that the 6D left mostly positive impressions, allowed me to expand my horizons, opened up what was previously inaccessible. And I can definitely recommend this camera. I hope that we have more than one year of adventures ahead of us.

If you have any questions after reading my review, write in the comments and I will answer them.

The reflex Sony Alpha 99 II received a full-frame 42-megapixel CMOS sensor with a five-axis optical stabilization system, an electronic viewfinder, and a hybrid phase autofocus system. Its uniqueness lies in the fact that 79 focus sensors are located on a separate module, and 399 are located directly on the matrix. In terms of performance, the Alpha 99 II is also good. In spite of big weight final photos, burst speed is 12 frames per second.

Another feature of the camera is support for video recording in 4K resolution. And given that the headphone and microphone jacks are located on the side, the conclusion is that the Sony Alpha 99 II will appeal to videographers who want to get videos of excellent quality. What's more, the micro-HDMI port allows you to connect an external monitor to the camera.

Note that the Sony Alpha 99 II is very easy to use, and the location of the controls indicates the manufacturer's thoughtful approach to the ergonomics of its product. By the way, the camera settings, which can be accessed through the on-screen menu, are also structured as meaningfully as possible.

Sony Alpha 7: The first mass "mirrorless"

The Sony Alpha A7 is arguably the first mass-produced mirrorless camera with a full-frame sensor. Resolution of 24 megapixels, low-pass filter, hybrid autofocus, high build quality - the list of advantages of this camera can be continued for a long time. We note right away that this model costs almost the same as semi-professional “DSLRs”. But what is the advantage then?

First and foremost, it is almost half the size and weight, which is very critical for most photographers today. The second is support for all modern wireless interfaces and the ability to connect directly to gadgets via Wi-Fi. Of course, the Sony Alpha A7 also has disadvantages compared to DSLRs: for example, shorter battery life, relatively low burst speed, and not such a rich choice of optics. However, once you try shooting with the Sony Alpha A7, you won't want to go back to the big camera.

With the use of good lenses, the images taken with this camera will satisfy the requirements of professional photographers. The highest quality of the picture both in daylight and in the dark is provided to you.

Rating of full-frame SLR and mirrorless cameras

PHOTO: manufacturing companies