Proverbs and sayings about May HORIZONTALLY: 2. May will deceive - in ... will leave.4 ....
![Spring crosswords Make a crossword on the theme of spring](https://i2.wp.com/malyshlandiya.ru/wa-data/public/site/img/may_001-1.jpg)
We continue to study modal constructions, and today our task is to understand why the combination have to is a modal verb, and not the usual expression of possession, as it might seem to many. The fact is that the English have carries many contexts for which both meanings and grammatical rules differ. We will try to clearly distinguish between the scope of use and the norms of grammar for each case. Let's start with the main have value, and then we will move on to mastering the modal construction: consider its functions, methods of formation and examples of sentences. Let's get started!
The main use of this verb is the designation of belonging, possession, possession, translated into Russian by the phrase " he has smth.», « havesmth.". With its help, they indicate the features of appearance, capabilities, the presence of certain objects and properties. Such combinations have been practiced since the very first English classes. Gradually, students will learn that the verb to have in English language has 2 forms for the present, have/has (3rd person singular), and for the past and future, one each: had and will have.
Verb have and combination havegot carry the same semantic load, and differ only in the established tradition of use. The British prefer to build phrases with havegot, and the Americans with a simple have. However, the combination with got is characteristic only for the present tense. In other cases, it has the usual forms had and willhave.
Discrepancies also arise in the construction of questions and negatives. havegot can create them yourself, and have only with the auxiliary do.
The future and past tense will be the same for both kinds of verbs.
The same rules apply to negatives.
In addition, the verb have is part of many set expressions, denoting some kind of action in them.
Denoting an action (but not a state!), have is also used in the form of a continuum.
Note also that have is an auxiliary verb for the formation of all aspects of the perfect group. More details on this point can be found in the relevant articles.
The use of the verb to have to as a modal construction can be immediately distinguished by the presence of the particle to.
In the combination have to, the modal verb denotes necessity, duty, forced measures. It is analogous to must, and even replaces it with its past form had. However, there is some difference in semantic meanings: must is what needs to be done by an independent decision, and have to is what is done under the pressure of circumstances.
Constructions with this modal word can be used in all forms of time: past, future and present.
As in the semantic meaning, the present tense is formed by two types of predicate: has to for the third person singular. nouns and pronouns, and have to for other persons. The modal helper is followed by the infinitive of the main verb. The generalized scheme will look like this:
Mybrother (1) hasto (2) clean (3) hisroom (4) – My brother will have to clean his room.
In statements that have the past or future tense, the predicates will be the same for all forms.
Creating questions and negatives for the verb have to requires the participation of auxiliary verbs. Consider their formation and application using the table.
Interrogative sentences | ||
The present | Past | Future |
Do/does (3l.) …have to….?
Do you have to learn the verse? Do you need to memorize this verse? Does he have to answer all these questions? Does he need to answer all these questions? |
Did…have to…?
Did they have to pay for all things? Theyforcedwerepayallthings? Did she have to live with her husband's parents? Was she forced to live with her husband's parents? |
Will…have to…?
Will we have to make the report next month? Will we have to do a report next month? Will he have to pick up the children from school tomorrow? Does he have to pick up the kids from school tomorrow? |
Negative sentences | ||
present | Past | Future |
…. don't/doesn't have to…
I don't have to go to the office. I don't have to go to the office. She doesn't have to cook supper for guests. We will go to a restaurant. She doesn't have to cook dinner for guests. We'll go to a restaurant. |
… didn’t have to…
We didn't have to do that exercise. We didn't have to do this exercise. He didn't have to wash the car. He didn't have to wash the car. |
…won'thaveto…
We won't have to go to the gym. There will be room with gym equipment in our new house. We won't have to go to the gym. In our new house there will be a room with exercise machines. She won't have to buy potatoes tomorrow. She won't have to buy potatoes tomorrow. |
Please note that, unlike must, negative sentences are not a prohibition, but an indication that there is no need to perform these actions.
According to grammatical norms, the modal verb have to is used in English in several contexts.
1) To indicate a forced need, i.e. the person was obliged, forced or forced to perform the specified actions. This is the main purpose of this design.
2) In a certain situation, this construction may have the meaning of an assumption, a conclusion. True, in most cases, the British prefer to use must for these purposes.
3) In addition, this combination allows you to give advice or recommendations, try to convince the interlocutor to perform the specified actions or take part in events.
Here is such a multi-valued and diverse verb have in English! We hope you have learned all its meanings, and now you will never confuse semantic, auxiliary and modal have. See you in new classes!
In order to exist in this world, we daily have to do things that are dictated by duty, which we are obliged to do, whether we like it or not. modal have to in English is used specifically to denote this kind of obligation. In other words, if the speaker means that he must do something not of his own free will, but because such are the circumstances or a sense of duty requires it, it is precisely have to that is used.
Have to has another option, have got to. It should not be confused with the functional verb, which means "to have".
Unlike have to, which indicates a repeated action, have got to is used when the speaker means something specific.
For instance:
In all cases, the action performed by the speaker is dictated by a sense of duty, and not by internal motives.
In practice in colloquial speech more often, the have to variant is used to denote both a repetitive and a specific single action.
In some cases, have to and have got to replace must, although they are not its direct equivalents. So, if grammatically must cannot be used, have to is put. This rule is true for the expression of obligation in the past and future tenses, as well as in negative expressions. For instance:
Please note that the mustn't form was not used in the negative sentence, since it does not translate “shouldn't”, but “shouldn't”. For comparison:
In the case of needn't, there is some confusion when translating into Russian. This verb also means "don't need", but its original meaning is much softer. So, when needn’t slips into speech, it means that there is no need to do something, that it is not necessary. When translated into Russian, phrases with needn’t and don’t have to will sound almost the same. In order to make an adequate translation into English, pay attention to that. what meaning in the original language was embedded in the phrase. In other words, look into the context and make a contextual translation.
The uniqueness of have to is that, firstly, it is followed by a particle to, although in any English grammar textbook it will be written that the so-called bare infinitive is used after modals, that is, an infinitive without a particle to. Compare:
This sentence contains three model verbs at once, but only have to has a piece of the infinitive after it.
The next feature of the verb is that, unlike most, it requires the use of an auxiliary verb of the corresponding tense. For instance:
Have to can be a real problem for people who are starting to learn a language. It's all about the coincidence of the form have to analogues in Present and past perfect. But it is difficult only at first glance. Let's dwell on this in a little more detail.
The main reason for the confusion is in the verb have. It can be both semantic and auxiliary. So when the same verb occurs in a modal function, people get lost. In order to determine the function of the verb in each specific case, a thorough knowledge of grammar will be required first of all. So the difference between modal, auxiliary and functional will be obvious. For instance:
Each of the sentences contains the verb have. In the first one, it is a simple functional verb "to have". V this case meaning that the speaker has certain information. Have is followed by a noun and immediately followed by an article. This is the main clue. Functional verbs are always followed by a noun or pronoun.
In the second case, after have there is a particle to, and then another verb tell. The verb + verb link indicates that in this case have to carries the semantic connotation of modality and is translated “should”.
Finally, in the third sentence after have comes the third form of the verb to tell - told. This is a hint that we have in front of us in the function of the auxiliary verb for the Present Perfect tense.
Thus, despite the fact that the verb to have occurs in most different options, it is not difficult to determine its function in each specific case. The main thing is to know the basic rules for connecting words in a sentence. English - analytical language, so the word order is fixed. This makes it easier for all language learners.
Modal verb have to is used in English most often to describe and express the need and obligation to perform some action. However, it can also describe certainty, certainty or probability, but in these semantic meanings it is used less frequently.
In many ways, have to is very similar to must, and sometimes it is easy to confuse their use. However, if must is a firm obligation that is non-negotiable and must be fulfilled, then the expression have to has a certain connotation of compulsion. That is, a person may not want to do some actions, but he is obliged to do it, and not out of moral motives, but under some kind of pressure.
It is easy to determine the difference between the use of certain verbs if we consider one situation in a different emotional coloring.
Jack, I need to tell you something. Jack, I need to tell you something. (There may not necessarily be a sad emotion here. On the contrary, such a sentence can be pronounced intriguingly, foreshadowing a pleasant surprise.)
Jack, I must tell you something. Jack, I have something to tell you. (A person is obliged to tell something for moral reasons.)
Jack, I don't want to tell you that, but I have to. “Jack, I hate to say this, but I have to. (Here it means that a person is forced to say. For example, he is the boss, and his position forces him to do so.)
You can also give an example where have to is often used to describe an action that needs to be supported more out of social considerations than out of vital necessity.
I must go to doctor tomorrow. - I have to go to the doctor tomorrow. (This refers to the consideration of ensuring life and health. If I do not go to the doctor tomorrow, I will die or get sick.)
I have to go to doctor tomorrow. - I have to go to the doctor tomorrow. (Here, we consider the case when you need to go to the doctor tomorrow in order to stick to the planned schedule. That is, you can go in a week, but such actions will let the doctor down, since he made time for an appointment for tomorrow.)
Along with the modal verb have to, the grammar uses the form have got to. There is no significant difference between them. However, if the first form is used in formal and colloquial speech, then the second is more in colloquial. Some philologists and linguists who study English thoroughly say that have got is used to describe one-time circumstances, but have to is used when talking about permanent duties.
I don't have to write it every day, but tomorrow I have got to write it. I don't have to write this every day, but tomorrow I will have to write it.
By the way, one should immediately note the grammatical difference between these forms. In questions and negations with the have to construction, an auxiliary verb is additionally used, but with the have got to form it is not needed.
Have you got to read it? - Do you need to read this?
I haven't got to clean. – I shouldn’t/should/have to clean it.
Do you have to make it? - Do you need to make it?
I don't have to clean it. – I shouldn’t/should/have to clean it.
In colloquial speech, the form have got to is contracted into I've gotta do, and sometimes the verb have is even omitted, and people can say I gotta do. In general, the modal verb have to and the form have got to are used to express compulsion, necessity, and certainty. Of course, abbreviated forms can be used in a conversation, but they are not yet applicable in formal documents.
Your application is accepted
Our manager will contact you soon
close
An error occurred while sending
Send again
The verb system of the English language is significantly different from Russian. You can often hear: “English is so complicated! And modal verbs are something from the realm of fantasy. In fact, there is nothing complicated about them: you need to carefully look at them.
In this article, we will deal with one such verb - “have to”.
The modal verb have to can be used in the present, past and future tenses. The table shows education in detail different forms verb.
Alan had to wait for a long time. Alan had to wait a long time. Our class didn't have to plant trees. Did you have to wear uniform at school? Did you have to wear uniform at school?
They will have to prepare a project. They prepare a project. My brother won't have to walk the dog. Will Ann and John have to take a maths exam? Will Ann and John have to take a maths exam?
They have to wear uniform. (The school has such a rule) They must wear a uniform. (There is such school rule) Peter had to read two books a week. (To prepare for the exam) Peter had to read two books a week. (To prepare for the exam) I’ll have to water my mother’s flowers during two weeks. (My mother won't be at home, so I will do it instead of her) I have to water my mother's flowers for two weeks. (She won't be home and I'll do it for her)
It has to be Michael's car. I saw photos of his car. It must be Michael's car. I saw pictures of his car. That has to have been Sara. They said she was slim and tall. Most likely it was Sarah. They said she was slim and tall.
You don't have to read that book. You don't have to read that book. John doesn't have to take chemistry exam. John didn't have to take a chemistry exam. They won't have to pay for dinner. They don't have to pay for lunch.
Important!
if a negative adverb or pronoun is used in the sentence, for example never, then the particle not is not used. With one verb, there can be only one negation:
Allan never has to think about a job. Alan never has to think about work.
Consider a modal verb have to / have got to in English, its use cases and temporary forms with examples and translation.
People who are not native speakers have a difficult situation with this branch of grammar, in fact, modal verbs sometimes mean the same thing.
For instance,
Must(should) is based on personal requests, and the modal verb have to(obliged) due to circumstances from outside and represents the absence of an alternative when requested. Consider an example:
🔊 You must go on a budget. - You must go to the budget.
(your family can basically pull your paid education, but they would like to protect themselves from such expenses, you should have a choice)
🔊 You have to go on a budget. - You must go to the budget.
(you have no choice, your family will not be able to pay for your education, so you have to try)
Important! Distinctive features of modal verbs have to and have got to are: the self-sufficiency of these verbs (they can express the category of person and number) and, unlike other modal English verbs, the particle is used before the main verb after them to.
Verb to have translates as "to have / to own", and the modal verb have to- “must / must”. Below are examples of proposals.
🔊 I have a phone. - I have a phone.
🔊 I have to go.- I have to go.
Absolutely different meanings, is not it?
Comment! Interrogative and negative form of the modal verb have to formed together with an auxiliary verb to do(See examples of sentences below the summary table).
present tense | Past tense | Future | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | have to | don't have to | had to | did not have to | will have to | won't have to |
You | ||||||
We | ||||||
You | ||||||
They | ||||||
He/she/it | has to | doesn't have to | ||||
approved | negative | approved | negative | approved | negative |
Present Simple:
a) Approval
🔊 She has to come to the office at the right time. - She should come to the office at the right time.
b) Denial
🔊 I graduated from school and I do not have to do my homework anymore. — I finished school and I am more is not obliged to to do homework.
c) Question
🔊
Does she have to do this project? — Should she do this project?
past simple:
a) Approval
🔊 I had to write to him. - I AM should have write him.
b) Denial
🔊 I didn't have to ask her about her age. - I AM shouldn't have ask her about her age.
c) Question
🔊
Did I have to help you? - I AM should have can I help you?
Future Simple:
a) Approval
🔊 Jane will have to go at 7 p.m. — Jane have to go at 7pm.
b) Denial
🔊Isabella won't have to write this work. — Isabella don't have to write this work.
c) Question
🔊
Will I have to do this exercise? - To me have to do this exercise?
In addition to tense forms, the modal verb have to there is a form have got to(she met above). The difference between these forms is practically not noticeable. So, have got to is used in British English mainly in the present tense and indicates a specific non-repetitive action.