Which intel core i5 is better for gaming. Coffee Lake Benchmark: i3, i5 or i7? Choosing a processor for a mid-budget gaming computer

The names of the best Intel processors deserve different models of this American brand, whose products occupy at least 2/3 of the global CPU market.

When buying a suitable option, first of all, you should consider what tasks a computer equipped with this chip will perform.

So, to run modern games at maximum settings, some processors are suitable, for the same purposes, but without special requirements for graphics - other models, for work - third ones.

Comparative characteristics

Tab. 1. Intel Processor Options

The best models for office PCs

A high-performance processor capable of running a powerful game at maximum settings or playing a 4K movie is not needed by every user.

Some will be quite satisfied with the CPU, which launches office applications quickly enough and does not freeze when launching several dozen tabs in the browser.

Of course, such chips can also be used for games, but only released a few years ago, and for films with FullHD or 2K resolution.

Intel Celeron G3900

The Celeron G3900 is one of the best processors from Intel in terms of performance to price ratio.

This chip is far from powerful gaming CPUs, and most modern games will not run even at medium settings - however, with HD resolution and a modern video card on the computer, it can provide at least 30-35 fps in shooters and action games of 2014-2016.

However, they buy it not for the gaming process, but for the possibility of fast Internet surfing, watching videos and fast operation of system utilities (including antivirus) - and the G3900 successfully copes with this task when equipped with at least 4 GB of RAM.

• Low cost - a new processor can be bought on the Web for only 1200 rubles;
• The presence of integrated graphics that allows you to watch videos in HD and FullHD without an integrated graphics card;
• Minimum power consumption - TDP of the processor does not exceed 35 W and practically does not load the power supply. A computer with a Celeron G3900 and an integrated graphics processor can work with a low-performance 250-300 W PSU;
• Quiet operation of the CPU cooling fan.

• the inability to use it on modern gaming computers, even at a basic level.
• there are few gamers who will be satisfied with the minimum settings and low frame rate.
• taking into account the price category of the processor, it has no other shortcomings.

In the list of advantages of the CPU, you can find:

Alexey N.: I bought a PC with such a processor for a work computer - although, if desired, you can run Minecraft on it (the children are addicted), and a number of not too old strategies. You don't even need an additional video card. Among the advantages I can name quiet operation, among the disadvantages - low productivity, although no one complains, they were counting on that.

Intel Pentium G4600

The G4600 can be called a transitional processor between an office PC and a budget gaming computer.

The performance of the CPU with integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 630 is enough to run some modern games at minimum settings.

If the video card is discrete (for example, GTX 750Ti or GTX 1050Ti), the performance is noticeably improved, although it still remains far from the maximum values.

• support for packages for working with DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.4 graphics and up to 64 GB of RAM;
• the ability to simultaneously work with three displays with a resolution of 2K even without a discrete video processor;
• relatively affordable cost.

Negative:

• The owners of computers with Pentium G4600 practically do not notice any shortcomings. Although some users have problems with the integrated graphics in the Windows 7 operating system. On a Windows 8 and 10 PC, the graphics processor works fine.

Igor T.: I replaced my old dual-core AMD processor with this processor (of course, along with the board). The speed has increased noticeably - although there are also only 2 cores. The fps in toys also increased - for example, in the third Witcher - on low settings it became 40 frames per second with 8 GB of RAM. I see no point in buying a more powerful and expensive processor, since I rarely play.

Budget gaming processor

Fans of gamers, whose financial resources are limited, can try to build a computer with more productive hardware compared to office models, but at a low price.

For such PCs, inexpensive models of Intel processors are suitable - first of all, dual-core CPUs from the Core i3 series.

Intel Core i3-7100

The Core i3-7100 processor, on the one hand, is notable for low performance in games and applications, on the other hand, it can be used to run such a not too old game as Battlefield 1 of 2016 with FullHD resolution.

This becomes possible due to the fact that the CPU has two cores, but four threads, and the graphics, although built-in, are modern.

In the segment of budget Intel processors that can be used to build a gaming PC, this model is the most profitable - although due to savings, the computer owner does not have any "reserve" for the future.

Positive:

• relatively low (though not budget) cost;
• productive integrated graphics, which may not be enough for a comfortable gameplay, but enough to run at least high-resolution video (FullHD and 2K);
• the presence of 4 threads, giving the processor advantages over dual-threaded dual-core models;
• low power consumption (less than 50 W).

Negative:

• not the highest performance. Although this situation is quite expected for a processor from the price category up to 10 thousand rubles.

Nikita K.: A good choice for a person who rarely plays or runs games that are not too demanding on resources, using the computer mainly for video or, for example, to maintain his YouTube channel. Such a percentage is also suitable for a PC that serves as a home multimedia center.

Intel Core i3-7300

The clock speed of the i3-7300 processor is 4 GHz, which allows, in the presence of 2 cores and 4 threads (and a computer with 6-8 GB of RAM), to assemble a system to run productive games at minimum and medium settings.

The difference from the i-7100 model is not so big, as well as the price.

• affordable price, still not leaving the budget (for gaming processors) price category;
• good indicators of integrated graphics, allowing undemanding users to do without buying a discrete video card;
• low power consumption (CPU TDP about 51 W).

Negative:

• The disadvantages of the processor can only be noted by comparing it with models from the Core i5 and Core i7 series. For its price, the capabilities of the i3-7300 are quite decent and allow you to assemble a budget gaming PC for an amount in the range of 30–40 thousand rubles.

Sergey M.: Tried to build an inexpensive PC for gaming and work. With the help of the i3-7300 processor, it seems to have coped with the task. Games, of course, do not fly - but, if you do not threaten the most demanding and new ones, everything suits. At least 30 fps wherever I needed, it provides freely.

Intel Core i3-7320

The Intel Core i3-7320 CPU is the best option for those users whose budget for buying a computer does not exceed 40 thousand rubles.

The owner of such a processor can afford to run modern games at good settings (for example, Battlefield 1 with FullHD resolution and 60-80 fps - although this option is available only with 8 GB of RAM and a video card with 4 GB GDDR5) and watch video in 4K format.

When comparing the chip with the more powerful i3-7350K model, the difference in performance was no more than 5-10% with a price reduction of about a third.

• the ability to build an inexpensive gaming PC;
• a good ratio of performance and price;
• power consumption at the level of 51 W and, as a result, a small heating and relatively quiet operation;
• decent integrated graphics, which is also enough to play high-resolution video.

Negative:

• poor performance when working with multi-threaded applications.
• users also note such a drawback as the inability to overclock the processor normally - in fact, during overclocking, the frequency increases, but fps in games almost do not change.

Maxim L.: A good processor - but only if you invest in a good video card. Integrated graphics is clearly not enough for a normal game. And for work on an office PC, the processor is too expensive.

Midrange processors

The price of such CPUs is comparable to the amount on the price tag of an average office computer in the assembly (and sometimes even higher).

But with their help, you can run any modern games, although not always at maximum graphics settings.

Intel Core i5-6600K

Buying an Intel Core i5-6600K chip allows you to spend less than 20 thousand rubles on the central processing unit, and about 50 thousand on the entire gaming PC.

The processor frequencies (3.5 GHz nominal, 3.9 GHz in turbo mode and 4.5 GHz after overclocking) allow you to use it to run most games at medium and even maximum settings.

For example, testing in the popular action GTA V will show more than 100 fps with the i5-6600K CPU - even with a video card no lower than the GeForce GTX 1070.

Positive:

• high performance even in modern games;
• low power consumption and temperature not higher than 55 degrees at maximum load;
• good overclocking opportunities.

Negative:

• high price. But the i5-6600K processor already belongs to models that have average performance and a higher cost compared to budget chips.

Andrew L.: The CPU easily overclocks to 4-4.5 GHz even without changing the thermal paste. The CM 412s cooler copes well with cooling. Games run with good performance - vidyuha GTX 750Ti. I'm not going to change to a new one yet, I don't see the point.

Intel Core i7-6700K

The processor belonging to the 6th generation of Intel processors is still on the list of the best models and is suitable for working with any applications and running all modern games (the same GTA V starts at 70-80 fps with FullHD graphics, the same shows test in Battlefield 1).

Although for a comfortable gaming process, you will have to supplement the chip with a productive video card and at least 8 GB of RAM.

The features of the model are support for Hyper-Threading technology for simultaneous operation of several threads on one core and the presence of a turbo mode that speeds up work by 5%.

Positive:

• good overclocking opportunities;
• the presence of a turbo mode;
• relatively low power consumption in normal mode (although quite large when fully loaded).

Negative:

• high speed of processor heating.

Alexander P.: Powerful processor - even if outdated, it still pulls at decent settings. Supports DirectX 12 and easily runs even games from 2017 - however, with video cards like GTX 1060 and 1070.

Intel Core i7-7700K

The processor from the Kaby Lake series was considered a flagship model not so long ago, but it is already outdated - that's why it costs no more than 22-24 thousand rubles.

Nevertheless, the CPU copes with all the tasks that users solve with its help - both with modern games, and with multi-threaded processes (with 4 cores and 4 threads), and with the simultaneous launch of a number of programs and browser tabs.

The integrated graphics of the chip also provide good performance, although it is desirable to use discrete cards for the gameplay.

• launching any modern game (even those released in 2018 and those that will only be released in the near future) with maximum or close to them graphics settings;
• a price that cannot be called low - but should not be attributed to the upper price category;
• integrated graphics, which allows you to do without an additional video processor (for example, temporarily turning it off to save power).

Negative:

• First of all, this is a small margin for overclocking (although not every user will try to overclock it).
• Secondly, the model gets very hot during operation and requires a powerful cooler.

Oleg T.: I bought the processor about a year ago, since then, they say it is outdated - but I do not see it. Everything works quickly, fps is more than decent. I won't update for at least another two years. Unless there are some games with very serious requirements.

Intel Core i7-8700K

The processor from the Coffee Lake series belongs to the most productive models of late 2017 - early 2018.

The presence of 6 cores and 12 MB of cache allows it to run any gaming applications and even leave a certain margin for gamers.

Buying a PC with an Intel Core i7-8700K can afford not to upgrade until at least 2020.

• good cost-performance ratio;
• relatively low power consumption for such a powerful CPU - 95 W;
• good overclocking capabilities (minimum up to 4.9 GHz).

Negative:

• it is worth noting the almost obsolete socket 1151.
• Another drawback is that the increase in fps in modern games is not too big compared to the "younger" models - although after overclocking the differences are noticeably greater.

George N.: The maximum speed that you can get for this money. I immediately bought it and dispersed it - otherwise why take it at all? I hope it will last a long time.

Intel Core i7-5820K

Not the fastest Intel processor for the LGA 2011-v3 slot - but the best if you take into account the ratio of price to speed.

When overclocked, the CPU frequency increases to 3.6 and even 4.1 GHz, although the latter value is only possible with an efficient cooling system.

• serious overclocking potential;
• high performance in games - especially if you increase the frequency;
• relatively affordable cost for its speed.

Negative:

• high temperature, especially when turning on the turbo mode and after overclocking. If the CPU cooling system turns out to be inefficient, it can go into throttling, reducing the frequency and speed. However, the i7-5820K has a large margin - problems begin only when heated to 105 degrees.

Victor I.: Not a bad option for a gaming PC. Especially if used together with new and powerful vidyuhi 4-8 GB GDDR5. It is inexpensive for its capabilities, and, for sure, will remain in the top at least until the end of 2018.

Most productive

The purchase of such a processor is not always justified, but it provides a “margin” of performance for the future.

Even a gamer who chooses a Core i9 chip will have the opportunity not to change it over the next 3-5 years - to improve the performance of a computer, it is enough to increase the RAM.

Intel Core i7-7820X

The i7-7820X is the best option for a gamer who is trying to stay within a budget of no more than 150 thousand rubles.

Of course, not everyone can afford to pay such an amount for a gaming PC - but a purchase, with a GTX 1070 video card, 16 GB of RAM and an SSD drive, will allow you not to worry about launching new games for at least 2 years.

• a new socket that leaves a lot of room for upgrades;
• high performance in both single-core and multi-core modes;
• excellent overclocking potential.

Negative:

• strong heating and the need for high-quality cooling. The same feature increases the noise level when the computer is running, and requires a powerful power supply. If we also take into account the power consumption of a modern video card, a system with an Intel Core i7-7820X will need a PSU of at least 600-700 watts.

Sergei N.: I assembled the system on the Asus X299-A board with such a stone. I think that the socket 2066 will eventually replace it with a new model. Although this one is still enough for three years - in the same BF1 and with ultra-resolution it holds more than 100 fps.

Intel Core i9-7960X

The buyer of the i9-7960X model makes a contribution to the future (at least 3 years) - however, you will have to spend a lot.

A gaming computer with such a processor cannot be assembled cheaper than 250 thousand rubles.

But the capabilities of the chip will last for a long time - especially when you consider the support for 128 GB of RAM.

• almost the highest performance among all Intel processors (except for the 7980X model, the cost of which is even less affordable);
• a good margin of productivity for the next few years;
• new socket 2066 and support for 128 GB of memory.

Negative:

• high price.
• buyers of computers with such a chip should also pay attention to cooling systems.
• high power consumption increases the cost of ownership of the i9-7960X and the noise level during its operation.

Yuri V.: I haven't bought it yet, but I'm already counting on such a purchase. Due to the constant video processing on the computer (needed for work), I need just such a powerful processor. It will also come in handy for games. And the price, it seems to me, will pay off by the fact that you will have to buy a new computer very, very soon.

findings

A wide range of modern and slightly outdated Intel processors both provide a good choice and complicate the purchase.

In fact, choosing the right model is quite simple - just decide on the budget for assembling the entire computer as a whole and give preference to the option that suits your capabilities.

For a working computer, this could be a processor Intel Celeron G3900, for a budget game - Intel Core i3-7320.

For powerful and not too expensive - Intel Core i7-7700K, and for a margin for the future, it is better to give preference to the model Intel Core i7-7820X.

The most important hardware component of a PC and many other types of computer technology is the processor. The more powerful it is, the higher the performance of the entire system. What processors can the modern market offer us? By what criteria to choose a microcircuit? If we take the leaders of the PC solutions market, which processor is better - AMD or Intel? What about mobile gadgets? What is the best processor for a tablet or smartphone?

We will begin answering these questions by listing the most important characteristics of chips. These traditionally include clock speed, overclockability, cache size, bus performance, number of cores, and TDP value.

Clock frequency

The frequency of the processor is the most important, according to most IT experts, an indicator of its performance. This indicator determines the number of operations that the microcircuit performs in one second of time. The frequency is expressed in hertz (in practice, almost always in mega- and giga-units, abbreviated as MHz, GHz). The higher this indicator, the better the processor, respectively (ceteris paribus).

Modern processors operate at frequencies of 1.8-3 GHz. The range is quite large, but if a microcircuit is installed on the computer, at least at the level of the lower limit, then with a high-quality selection of additional hardware components, the system will be able to work fast enough to solve most user tasks.

"Overclockability" of the processor frequency

Many experts consider it appropriate to elevate such a property as "overclockability" to the rank of an important criterion when choosing a processor. It means the compatibility of technologies used in the manufacture of a microcircuit, with the possibility of artificially increasing its frequency (by software or hardware). That is, some types of processors operating with a performance of 1.5 GHz can be "overclocked", say, to 2 GHz. What does it give? This will bring the user closer to finding an answer to the question of which processor is better to take from a purely economic point of view: a microcircuit with a higher "factory" frequency (the same 2 GHz) would cost more. In turn, a chip that cannot be overclocked turns out to be less "profitable".

True, there is one nuance here. "Overclocking" of the processor is almost always accompanied by an increase in the temperature of its operation. And excessive heating of the microcircuit can lead to its failure. Therefore, the user will most likely have to buy an additional cooling system. What should be its characteristics? What is the best cooler for the processor? According to many experts, the performance of cooling systems for computer chips almost always correlates with their price. Therefore, a cooler that costs 3,000 rubles is most likely more technologically advanced than the one whose price is 2,000. What does it mean? It may well turn out that an "overclockable" processor combined with a high-quality cooler in total will be significantly more expensive than its more powerful counterpart with a high "factory" frequency.

Cache value

Another important parameter of the processor is its cache memory. It is a resource that is very close in purpose to RAM modules. Functionally, these hardware components are almost identical - both are types of memory designed to store and process data (in the form of signals). However, cache chips are many times faster than those in RAM. The more data operations they can "take" from the main memory modules, the faster the computer will work. When deciding which good processor to buy, the user should pay attention to the size of the cache in the chip, and what is especially important, to its values ​​depending on the level of memory of this type. What is it about?

The processor cache operates on three levels. They differ just in the speed of work. Of course, the higher the score for each level, the better. But the technological architecture of even the most modern processors implies significant restrictions on the size of the cache memory. Even at the first level, its value rarely exceeds 512 kilobytes (for comparison: the standard figure for modern RAM modules is 4-8 gigabytes, thousands of times larger). But, as in the case of ordinary memory, the principle works here - the more the better. I must say that 512 KB of cache is an excellent indicator, according to many experts. In turn, the recommended volumes for the cache memory of the second level are 1-2 MB, and for the third - 6 - 12.

Bus frequency

The processor bus is the area of ​​the chip that provides the exchange of signals with the microcircuits of the PC motherboard, as well as through their mediation with other hardware components of the computer. And here the principle "the sooner the better" is relevant. The optimal indicator for the bus frequency of a modern processor is 1.6 - 1.8 GHz. Although, as some experts note, values ​​​​within 1 GHz are sufficient to solve most problems.

Number of Cores

The above criteria convinced us that the principle "the more the better" should be the key. We learned how important the frequency of the processor is. Which memory best provides processor performance, we also determined - this is the "cache" of the first level. The next most important parameter is the number of cores that the chip is equipped with. What are these elements?

Processor cores are areas of the chip responsible for operations with numbers. A kind of "brain" of the processor. Accordingly, the more cores, the more calculations the processor can perform. A few years ago, most chips were equipped with only one "brain" element. Today the situation has changed. Processors with two, four or more cores have become popular. But how important is this indicator?

Despite the undeniable pattern that we mentioned above, namely, the more cores, the more productive the processor, there are experts who believe that everything is not so simple. The fact is that various tests of microcircuits have shown that a large number of "brain" elements may not be of practical significance. It all depends on the types of software running on the computer. There is software that simply cannot fully utilize both processor cores using only one. It turns out that the chip works "at half strength". And in many cases, it loses to a single-core counterpart (because due to technological features, one large processor "brain" works faster than a single small one of two).

More cores?

At the same time, experts emphasize the fact that now more and more programs are adapting to the architecture of processors with two or more cores. How to be a user? Experts recommend: you need to focus on a typical parameter for the market. Today it is exactly two cores. Most modern software can take full advantage of this resource. But four cores, experts admit, are too much for today's programs. Although, they believe, in the very near future, software creators will adapt their products to such a number of "brain" processor elements.

TDP

Another interesting criterion that will allow us to decide which good processor to buy is TDP. This indicator is expressed in watts, it allows you to determine how the technical characteristics of the cooling system of the microcircuit correspond to its temperature regime. For example, if the TDP of the processor is 80 W, then the cooler installed on it must have the appropriate heat dissipation capacity.

The practical significance of this parameter is, as experts note, of an economic nature. The fact is that a good cooler is not a cheap product. As a rule, the more power produced by this unit, the more expensive it is. Therefore, in many cases, you can get by with a processor with a low TDP (although it is usually less productive), but at the same time save a lot on the cooler. And if we are talking about microcircuits with the same frequency, number of cores and cache size, then, of course, priority should be given to those with a lower TDP value.

Thus, we are convinced that economy, along with the technical characteristics of the chips, is also important. Therefore, when deciding which processor is best for a computer, we will know the one whose use is accompanied by fewer indirect costs.

Intel or AMD?

Two companies, Intel and AMD, have been leading the global processor market for many years. Therefore, when choosing a microcircuit, in most cases the user will be determined between these two brands, as well as between sockets - socket types on the motherboard designed to connect one or another microcircuit. If the computer has a processor slot, say, for AMD, then it is almost impossible to connect a chip of another brand to it. Which processor is better - AMD or Intel?

It is difficult to answer this question objectively. Both processors have their advantages. It is also very difficult to say which processor socket is better. Objectively, the connectors are not much different, they are only designed for chips of a certain architecture. The technologies used in them are generally very similar.

At the same time, as experts note, a much more important aspect is not the brand of the microcircuit, but the feature of a particular model. Much more often, experts believe, one has to choose not between Intel and AMD, but between solutions of the same brand, presented on the market in the widest variety.

Therefore, we will not now find out which Intel processor is better, or its competitor. We will try to learn how to choose the optimal solution within a single model. Let it be Intel. If only because this company is the undisputed leader of today's microprocessor market, while AMD, according to experts, is still actively competing with the American brand).

Fellow competitors

The most popular solutions from Intel today are the Core processors, namely the i3, i5, and i7 chips. How do they differ from each other? How to choose the right chip? Which processor is better - i5 or any of its "brothers"?

The "youngest" in the line under consideration and affordable are Intel Core i3 chips. They have two cores installed - a typical, as we said above, indicator for the modern market. The i5 processor, in turn, is a little more expensive, but also more technologically advanced. It is also available in a quad-core format (however, as experts note, such models do not have some useful additional modules - for example, those that allow the microcircuit to process graphics on its own).

The i7 chip is the most powerful of the line. If we are still considering Intel processors - which one is better, we now know. It is installed in models with four and six cores. Computers with such a processor, as experts say, have not yet gained popularity, but this is a matter of the near future. Therefore, it makes sense, experts believe, to buy a PC with an i7 chip with an eye on new technology trends. To then be happy to state what a good processor we managed to buy a couple of years ago.

By the way, if the index of the Core line chip has the letter X, then, as experts say, this means that the microcircuit has a very good "overclockability". We learned above how significant this criterion can be.

How to choose a mobile processor?

Above, we examined the parameters that can help determine the choice of a chip for personal computers. We studied Intel processors - which one is better in terms of manufacturability. But, as you know, no less popular today are mobile devices - smartphones, tablets. What good processor for this class of devices can the market offer us? If for iOS gadgets from Apple the problem of choice is uncharacteristic (one brand - one microcircuit), then in the Android segment there are a lot of competing solutions. What is the best processor for Android?

One of the world's leading manufacturers of mobile processors for the Android platform is the American company Qualcomm. Among the most popular chip brands is Snapdragon. It is installed on devices such as Samsung Galaxy, HTC One. The Snapdragon processor in the latest modifications, according to many experts, is especially good at processing 3D graphics. Of course, it also performs standard computational operations perfectly well. Various tests conducted by experts every time show that Snapdragon is among the most productive solutions in its class.

Some "mobile" brands produce their own chips. In particular, these include Samsung, which uses in its devices not only chips from Qualcomm, but also a processor of its own production - Exynos. He, in particular, is also placed in the devices of the Galaxy line. Its experts call it one of the most productive in its class (although they talk about the increased power consumption of the microcircuit).

Intel is also present in the mobile processor market. Many experts believe that solutions from this company cannot yet compete with the leaders of the segment. But Intel, as experts admit, is still making progress. It is quite possible, they believe, that such processors as Clover Trail and Baytrail may well oust the mobile chips that we talked about above, and largely due to just the same greater manufacturability in terms of power consumption, experts believe, since battery life is the most important criterion functionality of mobile devices. There are also reports that Intel wants to release separate processors for both smartphones and tablets in order to consistently push competitors in both market segments.

What is the best processor for a tablet or smartphone? American from Qualcomm, his compatriot from Intel or "Korean" from Samsung? Experts do not advise unequivocally trusting the test results, according to which the Exynos processor is confidently leading. The performance of mobile devices, like PCs, is largely dependent on a large number of other hardware components. For smartphones and tablets, this is primarily the amount of RAM, the type of graphics accelerator. A significant role is played by the functionality of gadgets of specific brands. A smartphone or tablet can be very productive, but not endowed with the technological capabilities that a particular user needs. But other things being equal, it is quite acceptable to focus on the brand of the processor. Moreover, there are recognized leaders in the market.

When assembling a high-performance computer for resource-intensive dynamic games, a potential buyer always faces a choice: which processor to prefer. Indeed, in addition to several branded manufacturers, there are many platforms on the market, each of which has its own flagship.

The focus of this article is the gaming processor. The reader will get acquainted with the offer of manufacturers, find out which product is better in each price category, and also see the test results clearly.

Weak link

It's better to start with the fact that all processors that are based on the same physical core will not be considered. The fact is that there has long been evidence of the low efficiency of single-core platforms. Any attempt by the buyer to purchase such a gaming processor will not lead to anything good.

Firstly, most modern games are created for multi-core platforms (2-4 cores). The second criterion for the insolvency of a low-performance crystal is the inability to unlock the potential of a gaming video adapter. Naturally, the user has a lot of questions regarding the inoperability of an expensive graphics accelerator.

Also, experts in their reviews recommend potential buyers not to consider crystals operating at low frequencies as gaming solutions. It is better to set the minimum mark at the threshold of 3000 MHz. This condition affects not only personal computers, but also mobile devices, albeit with increased power consumption.

Pricing policy and games of manufacturers

There has long been an opinion on the market that the AMD gaming processor has the best value, and in terms of performance, nothing can be found more powerful than an Intel chip. There is some truth in this, if you look at the problem from one angle, when comparing the number of cores and their operating frequency, but IT experts recommend focusing on the needs of the end user.

Almost all AMD chips are superbly overclocked, which attracts the attention of potential buyers who want to save money. But for some reason, there is no information about the heating of the crystals and the necessary cooling in the reviews and tests. On the other hand, they attribute too many advantages that the modern gamer does not need at all. Therefore, a buyer who wants to purchase a sufficiently productive device at minimal cost will have to get to know the processors on the market closer.

Crystals of the past generation

It's no secret that Intel processors based on 4 cores are still in demand among many fans of resource-intensive games. True, such a solution is useful only to those users who own a full-fledged ATX format motherboard that supports 8 GB of RAM (4 bars of 2 GB each). It is also recommended to pay attention to processor support. Very often, manufacturers of cheap motherboards do not work with powerful multi-core crystals.

A budget Core Quad gaming processor or a Xeon server solution paired with a gaming video adapter and an SSD solid state drive can handle any existing game in the world. Only now it will not be possible to achieve ideally realistic quality - there is a serious limitation on medium graphics settings. But such an inexpensive solution suits many users, so crystals for the socket 775 platform will be in demand for a long time to come.

Don't forget that the presence of two and four cores based on Xeon does not limit the performance of the old platform. There are still ultra-fast Extreme Edition crystals on the market, which can double or even triple the performance of the corresponding system (we are talking about Socket 775).

Available segment

The entry-level class of modern components is opened by AMD gaming processors with two cores of the A4 line. It would seem that it could be better than 2 physical cores operating at a frequency of 3200 MHz! In addition, the chip has an integrated graphics core AMD Radeon HD7480. However, during testing, it turns out that the processor has obvious problems with mathematical calculations. This is due to the small amount of cache memory (and the processor has only two levels).

In the price category up to 2000 rubles, the A4 line has only one competitor - the 4th generation Intel Celeron. As practice shows, this budget crystal also has integrated graphics, but, unlike AMD products, it cannot be overclocked.

Both budget products are clearly not among the top gaming processors, however, fans of low-power games (for example, World of Tanks) will like them, because using integrated graphics at a resolution of 1600x900 dpi, the user will be able to achieve 50 FPS at medium quality settings.

Manufacturer's distraction

Readers have already had to deal with Intel Pentium G-series processors for the platform more than once. The manufacturer claims that the new chip can surprise any buyer. Yes, there will be no limit to the owner's surprise when he decides to purchase such a product to replace the obsolete Intel Core 2 Duo processor. Any testing (synthetic or gaming) will confirm that there is no difference in performance between both processors.

In fact, this is the same crystal, which has been slightly improved. After all, the best gaming processor under simply could not disappear from the market. However, the transition of the buyer to a new platform opens up more opportunities for the player. Over time, you can increase the amount of RAM, change the processor or video card, which could not be done with an old motherboard.

Hot Selling

In the initial gaming class, AMD X4 series crystals with 4 physical cores are in great demand. The fact is that this particular product has become for many users a real golden mean in terms of price-performance ratio.

For many potential buyers who wished to have 4 physical cores on hand on one platform, the choice of a gaming processor ended with just one manufacturer - AMD. The fact is that in the price category up to 10,000 rubles, Intel has nothing to offer.

In this class, the processors of the FX series, which have 4 and 8 cores on board, have proven themselves well. The manufacturer tried to saturate the demanded market with interesting and affordable products. Here it is better for the buyer to focus on the first level cache and choose a crystal with the highest core frequency. Indeed, for AMD processors, these parameters primarily affect the performance of the entire platform.

Winged swing

Intel gaming processors are also present in the entry-level class, but they are all limited to only two physical cores. Naturally, the buyer will obviously not like such an offer, but you should not rush to conclusions. As practice shows, Core i3 crystals are capable of a lot, and even outperform all competitors in performance.

Intel processors have a large amount of cache and do an excellent job with mathematical calculations, but they have serious problems with working with RAM. This is exactly what competitors use when they select special tests that require the speed of information exchange between the processor and memory. In resource-intensive toys that require a large amount of memory (for example, GTA 5), you can notice the difference in the work of two processors (Intel and AMD), but not all games are so dependent on the memory frequency.

Higher, faster, stronger

A powerful gaming processor in the price range up to 15,000 rubles is not so easy to choose. On the one hand, Intel offers its Core i5 solution, which is able to cope with any resource-intensive games that exist on the market. On the other hand, the AMD team has prepared a surprise for all its fans by providing the crystal with a powerful gaming video adapter integrated directly into the processor.

Naturally, many buyers prefer the "2 in 1" system, because discrete graphics accelerators are not cheap and users simply do not want to overpay. But there is also the other side of the coin - the integrated video card "steals" the RAM for its own needs, and the speed of the exchange of this memory between the GPU leaves much to be desired (DDR3 vs. DDR5).

How to deal with things?

In the middle price category, it is not so easy to choose a gaming processor for yourself. "Which one to choose - Core i5 or A10?" - almost every second buyer is interested. Experts in their reviews recommend that beginners take their time and prioritize, having determined their needs.

A powerful multi-core Intel crystal will be of more interest to owners of high-performance gaming-level video adapters, because only it can unlock the full potential of a graphics accelerator. Also, the Core i5 should be looked at by people who are not only fond of games, but also professionally work with 3D graphics, modeling or video editing.

But for owners of budget video adapters that use all the resources of a personal computer for games, it is better to give preference to the AMD A10 series processor. And do not get too carried away with overclocking such a crystal, because a thermal package of 95 watts requires decent cooling.

Unique Processors

The AMD gaming processor with six cores on board is clearly capable of attracting attention. After all, this is one of the few products on the market that combines affordable cost and high performance. Although many users in their reviews reproach the manufacturer for using 8-core solutions with locked cores to create such crystals, the fact remains that this processor is still considered the best choice in the middle segment.

An important factor responsible for performance is not the core frequency, but the installed cache. All 6-core platforms with this parameter are in perfect order: the crystal does an excellent job with mathematical calculations and is quite competitive with Intel Core i5 products. The only thing that confuses is the lack of an integrated graphics accelerator, to which all fans of AMD products are so accustomed. But still, the performance of the entire platform is more interesting to the buyer than an inferior symbiosis.

Powerful gaming platform

Intel has managed to attract the attention of potential buyers to its unique socket 2011 platform. The best gaming processor Core i7 Extreme Edition still ranks first in the performance rating of all platforms. The only thing that confuses is the price of such a solution - not every buyer is ready to pay 50,000 rubles for one crystal.

The main feature of such a system is the support for three-channel operation of RAM. Do not forget about the PCIex16 slots for graphics accelerators - they all also support accelerated data transfer and are focused on high performance of the entire gaming platform.

The only negative that owners pay attention to in their reviews is the cost of all components. The processor, memory, motherboard and several video adapters require quite significant financial resources from the buyer. On the other hand, such a platform is able to cope with any resource-intensive game.

New technologies are the key to success

After the appearance on the market of a new format of DDR4 RAM, Intel hastened to surprise its fans with new crystals in the Core i3/5/7 line. True, under the slogan "Choosing a gaming processor!" a well-known American manufacturer forgot to add that in practice the overall performance of the system does not increase in proportion to the cost of crystals. As for the professional use of a computer (3D modeling, video processing and work with complex mathematical calculations), such a platform is hardly suitable. At least, in terms of price-quality ratio, it is possible to assemble a platform much cheaper.

Perhaps in the next few years, manufacturers will be able to significantly increase the speed of the platform, but at the moment it makes no sense to overpay for the transition to Socket 1151 and 2011-3. Here it is better to take an example from AMD, which did not dare to such an insidious plan to attract potential buyers to its products.

A new trend dictates the conditions

In pursuit of a powerful crystal, most buyers are trying to save on a video card. But gaming GPUs are the basic devices for running any resource-intensive games. As practice shows, it is better to save on a processor and take a powerful video adapter than to be content with a budget accelerator with a powerful processor.

In fact, in the media you can find quite a lot of comparisons of both video cards and crystals, but experts recommend focusing on market segmentation. Don't forget about integrated solutions. Often, such a purchase allows the user to get good performance and benefits.

Inexpensive AMD processors with four cores, which have a small amount of cache, are best purchased with integrated graphics. The crystal will not be able to unlock the potential of a discrete gaming adapter, but the user will be able to save a lot.

Mobile market with its own conditions

Gaming processors for laptops are practically no different from the components of a personal computer. All the same price segmentation and performance division. True, there is another branch that significantly affects the choice of buyers. Intel chips installed in laptops have low heat dissipation, and AMD products tend to get very hot due to increased power consumption.

As practice shows, for most users, a powerful AMD processor in a mobile device often causes trouble. However, experts in their reviews assure that the whole problem comes down to the human factor. The fact is that all gaming laptops need to be cleaned frequently (2 times a year) from dust. Naturally, most users do not do this, blaming AMD for producing low-quality processors.

Gaming laptops

With mobile devices, everything is simple - the buyer does not need to look for which processors are gaming and which are not. In the expensive segment, the manufacturer independently calculated the performance of the entire platform and provided the end customer with a decent result. True, the choice is not as great as in the personal computer market.

Users can opt for AMD's A10 line of chips or look towards Intel's Core i5/7 processors. This is where the whole choice ends, and a potential buyer faces a problem with choosing a gaming video adapter that is equipped with a laptop. Once again, experts in their reviews recommend that beginners give preference to a powerful discrete graphics card at the expense of processor performance.

The right approach

Among sellers in the computer market, there is a special technique that allows you to quickly assemble a personal computer. Oddly enough, the game processor is not selected in the first place. Preference is given to the motherboard and video adapter. Well, after that comes the turn of choosing a crystal and RAM. This completes the layout with the final cost agreed.

And then everything is simple: the cost of the hard drive, power supply, case, monitor and other computer components is announced one by one. And the buyer decides whether he is ready to pay extra for the equipment, or in order to purchase the desired component, he will have to sacrifice the performance of the personal computer as a whole.

This technique provides an opportunity for a potential buyer to understand the difference between components in different price categories, because the seller, when changing the configuration, comments on which games and what settings will run on the assembled computer.

Finally

Choosing a gaming processor in the domestic market is quite easy. You just need to find out the system requirements for your favorite toy and choose the right components to build a gaming platform, focusing on your own finances. At first it seems difficult, but in practice everything is solved in a matter of minutes. The main thing is to always remember that the performance of the entire system depends not only on the processor, but also needs a powerful graphics accelerator with fast enough RAM.

The quality and speed of the functioning of a personal computer, as well as its performance, largely depend on the processor. This becomes clearly understandable when the PC refuses to cope with the tasks that the user sets for it. There is only one way out - to upgrade your computer and look for a new, more productive and modern processor. So that the purchase does not turn out to be useless, you need to clearly imagine how to choose a processor and what parameters it must have in order to cope with specific tasks. Similar problems arise for those who decide to assemble their own car with their own hands. Let's try to answer all questions as briefly and concisely as possible, as well as study the modern market and determine the best processors in 2018.

The main subject of controversy when choosing a processor is the manufacturer. There are currently two companies competing in the market - AMDandIntel. Arguing over which product is better is like the eternal debate about iOS and Android, or Canon and Nikon. Fans of this or that system are ready to tirelessly prove their point of view, while there is an “arms race” between the companies themselves, so it is impossible to unambiguously answer which processors are better, AMD or Intel. Someone once said that this is like a matter of religion or even a matter of habit.

We will return to the manufacturer's question, try to understand their proposals in more detail, but for now we note that when choosing a processor, you should still pay attention to its architecture, number of cores, clock speed, cache memory size and other parameters.

Processor socket, or socket type

The processor is installed in a special socket on the motherboard, so the type of socket (socket) they must match. Different types of connectors are incompatible with each other - a system assembled in this way will not work. Motherboard manufacturers indicate which processors a particular model is compatible with. Information is available in the instructions for the motherboard or on official websites. If you are building a computer yourself, then do not take an outdated motherboard: in a couple of years, when you want to upgrade your PC, you will have to buy not only a new processor, but also a new motherboard.

There are up to 30 different types of sockets, many of them are already considered obsolete.

Intel processors are now available with the following sockets:

For processorsAMDThe relevant sockets are:

• FM2/FM2+- inexpensive simple processors that are suitable for assembling conventional office systems and simple gaming PCs;
• AM3+- one of the most common sockets, on its basis it is possible to assemble systems of any power, up to the most advanced gaming computers;
• AM4 - a socket for the most productive processors that are used to build professional and gaming PCs;
• AM1 - a socket for the simplest processors.

Sockets LGA1155, LGA775AM3, LGA2011, AM2/+ are deprecated.

Number of cores and threads

The core of the process is its heart, brain and soul. The first multi-core processor was introduced to the world by Intel, but there is still an opinion that the idea was stolen from AMD. Let's not stir up the past - the main thing is that today single-core processors can no longer be found. It remains to figure out how many cores are really needed.

If we simplify a little, we can come to the following conclusions:

• 2 cores- an option for a computer that will be used to work with a basic set of office programs, launch a browser and watch videos;
• 4 cores- an option for both office use and for launching medium-sized toys. It all depends on frequency and architecture;
• 6, 8 and 10 cores– powerful computers for running 3D programs and the most modern and demanding games. A good option for a gamer.

Be aware that there are programs that cannot load balance across cores, and they will run faster on a 2-core processor with a higher clock speed than on a 4-core processor, but at a lower frequency.

Please note that there is processors with virtual extra cores. Special technology (Hyper-Threading for Intel, or SMT for AMD) allows you to clone each physical core, That's why the number of data processing threads does not always equal the number of cores. If you are told about an 8-thread processor, then it may have 4 or 8 real cores.

CPU frequency

Many users naively believe that the higher the clock speed, the better and faster the computer will run. This is not entirely true, more precisely so, but under certain conditions. Let's figure it out.

Clock speed refers to the number of operations a processor performs per second. Hence, the higher the frequency, the faster the "brains" work, and a 3.5 GHz processor would be preferable to a 2.8 GHz processor, for example. It really is, when it comes to processors of the same line where the same kernels are used.

Performance depends not only on the frequency, but also on the processor architecture and cache size, so you should not focus only on the frequency, but within the same line it is a significant factor.

Process technology

The process technology determines the size of the transistors on the processor and the distance between them. The method of photolithography is used to deposit conductors, insulators and other elements on a silicon substrate. The resolution of the equipment used forms a certain process technology and affects the size of the transistors and the distance between them.

The process technology is measured in nm and the smaller it is, the more elements can be placed on the same area. At the moment, the most modern processors have a 14 nm process technology.

This setting has a very indirect effect on performance. Much more significantly, it affects the heating of the processor. Improvement in technology allows each time to release a processor with a lower technical process, they heat up less. If we compare the old generation processor and the new one with the same performance, then the new one will heat up less. Since the performance increases in new models, the old and new “stones” are heated approximately the same. Thus, reducing the process technology allows manufacturers to create ever faster and more productive processors without increasing the degree of their heating.

Cache

Cache memory is a built-in ultra-fast memory that helps store and process data between cores, RAM and other buses. Essentially, this link between memory and processor. Thanks to this buffer, you can quickly access frequently used data. In modern processors, the cache has several levels (usually three, less often two). The more memory on them, the faster the "stone" will work, but again, this is true only for processors of the same line.

Memory is unevenly distributed across levels:

• L1 is first level cache, its volume is minimal (8-128 Kb), but the speed is the highest. The frequency usually reaches the level of the processor frequency;
• L2- second level cache, larger in volume (from 128 Kb) than the first one, but slower than it;
• L3 is the most capacious, but the slowest cache. On the other hand, even the third level cache is faster than RAM

If you need to choose a processor for a gaming computer or to run powerful professional programs with high graphics requirements, then it is better to take processor with the maximum possible amount of memory of the third level(the parameter usually ranges from 2 to 20 MB). This well-established truth has recently been destroyed by tests of new processors, which show that cache memory has practically no effect on performance in games. However, this parameter should not be written off - a good amount of cache memory will speed up data archiving and writing data from flash memory to a hard drive.

Integrated graphics core

Improvement in production technology made it possible to place various microcircuits inside the processor, incl. graphics core. The main advantage of this solution is that there is no need to buy a video card separately. They are built into the processor, as a rule, rather mediocre video cards in terms of capabilities, therefore models with an integrated graphics core suitable for users for whom graphics capabilities are secondary. These are budget processors for the office environment, but they will handle video from the Internet, most non-specific programs, ordinary toys and even entry-level 3D games.

If your goal is to assemble a powerful gaming computer, then it is better to take a processor without an integrated graphics core and then buy a powerful video card. Considering that it costs a lot, and many people have to save some more time for it, a processor with an integrated video card can be useful in this case too.

What is the bitness of the processor, and is it so important?

The bit depth of the processor shows how many bits the computer can process in one clock cycle. This setting affects performance. Currently, the most commonly used processors for 32 and 64 bits, there are also 128-bit processors, but their segment is still very limited.

Is a 64-bit processor always better than a 32-bit one, and what are the differences? If the processor has 2 cores, and 2-3 GB of RAM is used, then you will not feel the difference. A 64-bit processor, when using multi-core processors, can significantly increase performance when running 64-bit applications. In fairness, it should be noted that the increase in performance will not always be noticeable.

The main advantageous difference between 64-bit processors- This is the ability to work with RAM of 4 GB or more. If you have even 8 GB of RAM in your computer, a 32-bit processor will see and use only 3.75 GB of them.

Heat dissipation

The more powerful the processor, the more it heats up. It is good that the improvement of the technical process can significantly reduce heating. Today, the value of TDP, W, is used to assess heat dissipation. The smaller the value, the less heat generation. In portable computers, everything is well calculated, installed and works without additional cooling. If you need to assemble a very powerful computer, then you can hardly do without a cooler built into the processor (such models are marked as BOX, without a cooler - OEM).

If the system TDP 60 W or less, even the complete or simplest cooling system can be used. With heat dissipation up to 95 W it is better to take high-quality medium format fans - the complete one will not cope. At TDP 125 W or more you can not do without a tower cooler with several copper tubes.

Unlocked multiplier

If you are going to overclock the processor, then make sure that it is possible to do it in regular ways. It is important that the multiplier change function is also supported by the motherboard.

AMD or Intel - which is better?

There is no objective answer to this question and cannot be. Thousands of pages on the Internet have been created on this topic, disputes sometimes turn into scandals using obscene language - this is how users protect the products of their favorite manufacturer. Often, all these disputes are reminiscent of trying to figure out which is better, pineapple or sausage - there can be no consensus here.

In some segments, AMD is better, in some - Intel, but often even these opinions are subjective, so when choosing, rely purely on your subjective opinion - we will not interfere with you. Well, for those who have not yet decided on their subjective opinion, here are a few facts.

The competition between the two leaders is fierce, but it is believed that Intel is releasing more powerful processors that AMD cannot keep up with, and AMD, in turn, offers better budget solutions. But this opinion is too generalized, since Intel also has good inexpensive processors, while AMD offers good top-end solutions. In terms of durability and reliability, the products of both companies are on an equal footing.

To decide which processor is better, AMD or Intel, you need to clearly define goals for yourself and answer the question of what the computer is going for. Moreover, the number of cores and frequency do not always determine performance - it's all about a completely different architecture. Therefore, use special sites where you can view test results, compare with analogues and see what tasks this or that processor is best at.

We understand that we are touching on a very delicate and controversial topic, but still, let's talk about the general advantages of the processors of the two companies.

Processor BenefitsIntel:

• high performance and speed. Working with RAM is better optimized than AMD;
• a large number of games and programs that are optimized specifically for Intel;
• cache memory of the second and third levels often operates at higher speeds than on AMD processors;
• lower power consumption.

Processor DisadvantagesIntel:

• higher price;
• they are inferior to AMD processors in multitasking, despite the fact that they win when working with one process;
• strong binding to specific sockets, so when buying a new process, you will most likely have to change the motherboard as well.

Recently there was a real scandal. In processors from Intel, a vulnerability, which allows third-party malware to access the structure of a protected portion of kernel memory and discover where sensitive information is stored. Our passwords, messages, photos and payment card data can be read and used by intruders. Fixing this problem and an emergency update of the operating system will slow down computers by 20-30%. While the company was trying to resolve the conflict, it turned out that such there is a vulnerability in processors fromAMD.

Benefits of processorsAMD:

• affordable price, so many recognize the manufacturer's processors as the best in terms of price / quality ratio;
• multitasking;
• multiplatform;
• modern processors of the company have good overclocking potential, so they are catching up with Intel in terms of performance.

Disadvantages of processorsAMD:

The best processors of 2018

Best Intel Processors 2018

The kings of performance, Intel processors are presented in different price categories. AT in the public sector, these are the Celeron and Pentium lines. By the way, in terms of performance, they are superior to similarly priced AMD processors, but inferior to them in multitasking. For entry-level gaming PCs and multimedia computers, processors are suitable Core i3 , for more powerful - Core i5 , for the most powerful gaming - Core i7 .

Core i7-7700K

Despite the existence of more productive Core i7-6950X, Intel Core i7-7820X, Intel Core i9-7900X and some others, the Core i7-7700K can be considered the most balanced in terms of price and quality. The frequency is 4.2-4.7 GHz, there are 4 cores in stock, there is a built-in video card, but it will not be enough for top games, but it can easily cope with running video in the highest resolution. The price is about $400.

Core i7-6950X Extreme Edition

It costs obscenely expensive (about $1700), is equipped with 10 cores, received 25 MB cache of the third level, has a frequency of 3 GHz, supports Hyper-Threading technology. Power and strength! However, for assembling a gaming computer, the capabilities of the processor will even be too much. This solution is only for those who use very specific and highly demanding programs, and then you can find a suitable solution for less.

Core i5-7500

If you want to build a gaming PC, and the budget for buying a processor is modest, then the $200 Core i5-7500 is a good solution. Performance, L3 cache (6 MB versus 8 MB) are almost as good as the Core i7-7700K, and with a good video card, the processor can handle any game. There is a built-in graphics core that supports 4K video. 4 cores operate at a frequency of 3.4-3.8 GHz.

Core i3-7100

Two cores, four threads, a frequency of 3.9 GHz and low power consumption, combined with an affordable price ($110-170), makes this processor a popular favorite. Users note that when using a sufficient amount of RAM and graphics memory, this processor can pull even those games where Core i5 and Core i7 are indicated in the requirements.

Pentium G4560

The processor has 2 cores, but 4 threads, a frequency of 3.5 GHz. The cost is about $70, so if you need to build an inexpensive gaming PC, then this is a good option. It cannot be compared with more expensive solutions, but if you have an appropriate video card, it will handle modern games at minimum settings, and older and less demanding games will generally fly.

Pentium Haswell

A good option for an office PC. There are 2 cores, an integrated graphics processor, a frequency of 2.3-3.6 GHz. The cache volume of the third level is 3 MB. Heat dissipation is small. The cost is about $85.

Celeron Skylake

A simple inexpensive processor for computers designed to work with documents, browser and video viewing. Key features: 2 cores, frequency 2.6-2.9 GHz, 2 MB L3 cache, minimal heat dissipation, there is a graphics core. The cost is $45.

Best AMD Processors 2018

Ruler budget processors - Sempron, Athlon, Phenom, A4 and A6. A8 and A10 can be used for multimedia and light games, series FX- for gaming computers of the middle class, and Ryzen These are top processors. You can buy AMD processors on the website: all modern AMD developments are presented to the attention of potential buyers, as well as photographs of models, detailed lists of characteristics, brief descriptions and instruction manuals. To make it easier for you, we have selected some of the most interesting models suitable for different tasks.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

The honorable first place goes to the processor from the flagship Ryzen series - Threadripper 1920X. A 12-core "beast" with a clock speed of 3.5-4 GHz simply could not remain outside our rating. Incredible 24 streams allow you to make the most of your PC's performance. The processor is equipped with DDR4 memory (4 channels) with error correction function, which guarantees an extremely high data transfer rate. The cost is about $990.

Ryzen 7 1800X

Second place also goes to the representative of Ryzen - 7 1800X. This processor differs from the leader in the absence of virtualization technology, the number of cores (Ryzen 7 has eight of them) and, accordingly, threads (16), as well as RAM channels. There is support for an unlocked multiplier. This model is great for gamers - it "pulls" 3D games and simulation programs even at maximum settings. It costs about $480.

Ryzen 5 1600X

The top three also includes the Ryzen 5 1600X, a strong contender to the competing Core i5 family. Its characteristics are, first of all, 6 cores / 12 threads, Socket AM4 connector and two channels of RAM. Frequency - 3.6 GHz with the possibility of overclocking to 4 GHz. There is support for an unlocked multiplier. It costs about $260.

AMD A10-7860K

In fourth place is a productive 4-core processor designed for home PCs, as well as office use. Model with integrated graphics. Clock frequency - 3.6 GHz. It copes well with running games online (medium settings) with good performance and without overheating of the hardware. The price is about $100.

AMD FX-6300

Not a bad alternative to productive solutions from Intel. The processor works with 6 cores, has an unlocked multiplier, a clock speed of 3.5 GHz with the ability to overclock to 4.1 GHz. Socket - Socket AM3+. The performance is good, suitable for games and demanding applications, there is no integrated graphics core. The cost is about $85.

Athlon X4 880K

The TOP model from the Athlon 880K family closes - a 4-core processor for home PCs. The clock frequency of the model is 4.0-4.2 GHz. Together with the Radeon Athlon 880K graphics card, it delivers excellent performance and demonstrates all the positive qualities of AMD products. The cost is $84.

There is also a more budget solution from this series. The Athlon X4 860K runs on 4 cores at 3.7 GHz, but there is no integrated graphics core. The cost is $45.

You can still write a lot, give arguments for a long time, argue, test and reflect. We wrap up on this, and leave you alone with your thoughts.

If you don't have time to study the benchmarks, or if you need help choosing the right processor for your gaming machine, a simple list of the best processors for gaming will come in handy.

The first quarter of 2017 saw two major desktop updates. First, Intel released the seventh generation of Core processors, known as Kaby Lake, which use an advanced 14nm process technology. The optimization of the technical process allowed to achieve a small increase in frequency compared to the microarchitecture of the previous sixth generation Skylake.

AMD then made its biggest processor release in five years with the introduction of the Ryzen 7 family. After spending so many years battling 32nm and 28nm process technologies based on Bulldozer microarchitectures, AMD introduced not only a new core design, but also a new process technology (14nm GlobalFoundries ) with FinFET-based technologies.

In our processor guide, we look at specific segments and budgets and present you with the best selection of processors available.

Don't forget to save extra money with the cashback service, which returns 5% to 10% of the purchase price.

Premium gaming processor / VR

The leader is . It boasts top performance and high frequency. Kaby Lake on its own doesn't offer much more than Skylake did. But the Core i7-7700K's four cores with a base frequency of 4.2GHz and a maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 4.5GHz are great for gaming. In addition, additional architecture headroom and an unlocked multiplier enable overclocking to 5GHz. And these are, by far, the best features for VR. Plus a good cooler and a decent motherboard, the i7-7700K should provide a premium gaming system for years to come.

If you want to experience AMD then the latter is a good option. It doesn't quite match the single-thread performance of an Intel processor, but offers twice as many threads, which may be more important as games get more complex. A good 1700 processor can also overclock to 4.0 GHz, saving money on a more expensive . As an added benefit, the 1700 price also includes an AMD Wraith Spire cooler suitable for high ambient temperatures and RGB lighting.

Fast gaming processor / VR

For users who are looking for a better price, let's move to another segment of the processor market, which can retain a significant part of the expected performance, and save a significant amount of money. These processors won't give you maximum frame rates, but the money saved can be used to buy a more powerful graphics card.

For this segment from Intel, the choice is made in favor of . It provides four full cores at 3.4GHz, turbo up to 3.8GHz, and has 6MB of L3 cache included. In the absence of Hyper-Threading technology, each thread gets full use of all major resources, reducing potential bottlenecks.

Could be another option, but the difference in frequency (400 MHz in base, 300 MHz in turbo mode) is in favor of the i5-7500. The Core i5 will easily run the most powerful graphics cards on the market, but only the most demanding games at maximum settings can run a little hard.

As for AMD, the Ryzen 5 1600X is the better choice. is a six-core processor with Hyper-Threading technology, giving a full twelve threads, and runs at the same frequencies as its older brother 1800X, namely 3.6 GHz / 4.0 GHz. Based on performance/price projections, this processor is ahead of any other AMD offerings and should be highly competitive with low-end Intel Core i5 models in terms of single-thread performance.

Good gaming processor

For users looking to build a computer under $1,000 or something more conservative around $700, here are our recommendations. In this segment, the CPUs will squeeze out almost the maximum performance with a single graphics card at high resolutions and medium settings. However, esports games with these processors will work just as well.

Starting again with Intel and suggesting . This is a dual-core processor with Hyper-Threading Technology, clocked at 3.9 GHz. At this rate, it climbs up the single-thread performance ratings, well in line with the more expensive overclockable Core i7 and Core i5 processors. For Direct X9, Direct X10 and Direct X11 games where single thread performance helps drive a good GPU, the i3-7100 delivers best-in-class results.

In this segment, AMD has something to play with. At this level of performance, AMD's strength is price, as FX processors are sold at low prices, for example, and a cheap AM3 motherboard can be purchased for very little. The FX can't compete in single-thread performance with Intel, but with three modules and six threads, it does a good job of multitasking while gaming, like watching videos on a second monitor or streaming esports.

cheap gaming cpu

For those on a tight budget i.e. trying to get a decent gaming system between $300 and $500 is a must, we'll have to look at entry-level processors. Such processors are often paired with cards such as the RX 460 or a used GTX 700 series card, a standard hard drive, a small amount of memory, and a case with an integrated power supply. The base level of performance in such systems is small, so you can play either indie games or games that are already a few years old.

Let's start with Intel again, and to be honest, they recently launched something unexpected for this market segment. is essentially a Core i3, only with a different name, given that it has two cores and four threads, but a slightly reduced L3 cache. The G4560, priced at $55 and clocked at 3.5GHz, is a dual-core Kaby Lake processor that's only 900MHz slower than the top-end Core i7 and less than a fifth of its price. Previous Pentium processors didn't have Hyper-Threading technology, but this one does.

The Intel Pentium is hard to beat in many ways, AMD doesn't have much of an answer. The closest competitor we can come up with until we see what price Ryzen 3 comes with is 3.7GHz. This is one of AMD's APUs with a disabled graphics subsystem and a proprietary silent cooler for processors up to 100W. While the latest version, called the Excavator, performs well in the context of AMD's APU lineup, there are still significant performance hits of up to 40% that Intel can use to its advantage. The potential benefit in this case is the ability to buy a cheaper motherboard.

Hybrid processors/ eSport

Not many users like integrated graphics because graphics cards like the RX460 are relatively cheap and usually outperform what's on offer. However, almost all major processors come with integrated graphics for those who want to invest now in a good processor and later buy a graphics card, or have limited space in a small package, or to work with features such as QuickSync or OpenCL.

The champion among embedded GPUs is . Technically, Intel has better devices in Broadwell-based eDRAM processors, but they are 3 times more expensive and hard to find due to the limited release. Thus, the AMD A10-7890K is at the top of this segment, offering a level of performance close to the RX460, which is quite suitable for esports games such as League of Legends, DOTA2, CS:GO or Rocket League at very decent settings.

Users who need to save a few more bucks off the A10-7890K can watch instead. This APU takes a small step back in terms of performance, but it is one of the latest A10 devices released that is fully aimed at PC builders trying to get a good performance/price option.